A federal judge in Maryland has ruled that a lawsuit accusing the NFL's disability plan of denying valid injury claims can proceed to trial on most counts. The lawsuit, filed last year, alleges bad faith and violations of federal law by officials overseeing the program. The suit can move forward against the board, but not against Commissioner Roger Goodell or trustees individually.
Lawyers for the 10 retired players involved in the potential class action lawsuit hailed the ruling as a significant victory against what they called 'systemic injustice.' They expressed their commitment to holding the plan accountable and correcting the perceived flaws in the system for the benefit of future players.
The disability plan, established as part of the 2011 collective-bargaining agreement between players and the union, was intended to assist former players dealing with physical and cognitive injuries resulting from their time in the NFL. Successful claims could lead to substantial payouts, but plaintiffs allege that many retirees are unfairly denied benefits.
The lawsuit also raises concerns about the impartiality of doctors evaluating players' claims, suggesting a potential conflict of interest in the process. The judge's ruling allows the case to proceed to the discovery phase, where both sides will exchange evidence.
Among the plaintiffs are former NFL players like Willis McGahee, Eric Smith, and Mike McKenzie, who have detailed the ongoing physical and mental challenges they face due to injuries sustained during their playing careers. These players, along with others, have come forward to seek justice and support through the legal action.
The NFL, which expected significant annual payouts for the disability plan, has not yet commented on the ruling. The case represents another legal challenge for the league, with attorney Chris Seeger, known for his involvement in concussion cases against the NFL, leading the charge on behalf of the retired players.
