Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, a new government is taking shape, sparking questions about its Islamist stance and potential similarities to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The U.S.-designated terrorist group Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) previously ruled the Idlib Governate in northwest Syria, establishing the Syrian Salvation Government to focus on local governance. Despite attempts to shed global jihadist aims, HTS ruled with an iron fist, overseeing public services and public safety for approximately 2 million people in Idlib Province.
While HTS leader Mohammed al-Golani aimed to rebrand the group and focus on local issues, concerns remain about its governance beyond Idlib. Reports indicate a lack of democracy under HTS, with instances of violence against dissenters and suppression of political opposition.
Although HTS made efforts to moderate its Islamist stance in Idlib, questions persist about its overall governance approach. The power vacuum left by Assad's ousting has led to various groups vying for influence, raising concerns about stability and peace in Syria.
HTS's security forces enforced Sharia law in Idlib, with elements of the administration promoting a hardline interpretation. Despite promises to protect all Syrians regardless of faith or ethnicity, HTS's past ties to radical Islamism and violence raise doubts about its future governance.
The U.S. and other allies are monitoring HTS's actions, with discussions on potentially removing the group from the foreign terrorist list. Direct contact between the U.S. and HTS, including cooperation in locating a missing American journalist, could impact HTS's legitimacy and control over post-Assad Syria.
As HTS seeks recognition and potential delisting as a terrorist group, experts emphasize the importance of establishing clear criteria for such a transition. The implications of a designated terrorist group governing a country could have severe humanitarian and economic consequences, underscoring the urgency of addressing these issues promptly.
