During a recent testimony, David Pecker shed light on the workings between the National Enquirer and Michael Cohen. Pecker revealed that when preparing an article, they would communicate the direction of the article with Cohen. Additionally, they would send him the PDFs of the story before publication.
This revelation provides insight into the close relationship between the National Enquirer and Cohen, showcasing a level of coordination that went beyond typical journalistic practices. The exchange of information and collaboration between the two parties raises questions about the independence and integrity of the publication's reporting.
Pecker's testimony highlights the behind-the-scenes dynamics that influenced the content published by the National Enquirer. The direct involvement of Cohen in shaping the narrative of articles raises concerns about the publication's objectivity and journalistic standards.
As more details emerge about the relationship between the National Enquirer and key figures like Michael Cohen, the public is left to ponder the implications of such close ties between media outlets and individuals with vested interests. The transparency provided by Pecker's testimony offers a glimpse into the inner workings of tabloid journalism and the potential influence of external parties on editorial decisions.
