Aug Nymex natural gas (NGQ23) on Monday closed -0.089 (-3.18%).
Nat-gas prices Monday fell moderately on a cooler U.S. weather forecast, which will crimp nat-gas demand from electricity providers to power air conditioning. Forecaster Maxar Technologies said below-normal temperatures are expected in the upper Midwest, the Great Lakes region, and central California from July 8-12.
Lower-48 state dry gas production on Monday was 102.1 bcf/day (+4.5% y/y), according to BNEF. Lower-48 state gas demand Monday was 72.3 bcf/day, +9.2% y/y, according to BNEF. LNG net flows to U.S. LNG export terminals Monday were 13.1 bcf/day or +10.6% w/w.
A decline in U.S. electricity output is bearish for nat-gas demand from utility providers. The Edison Electric Institute reported on June 28 that total U.S. electricity output in the week ended June 24 fell -6.5% y/y to 83,677 GWh (gigawatt hours). Also, cumulative U.S. electricity output in the 52-week period ending June 23 fell -0.9 y/y to 4,062,665 GWh.
Nat-gas prices continue to be undercut by high inventories caused by weak heating demand during the abnormally mild winter. This past winter's warm temperatures caused nat-gas inventories to rise in Europe and the United States. Gas storage across Europe was 78% full as of July 1, well above the 5-year seasonal average of 62% full for this time of year. U.S. nat-gas inventories as of June 23 were +14.6% above their 5-year seasonal average.
Last Thursday's weekly EIA report of +76 bcf for the week ended June 23 was bullish for nat-gas prices since it was below the market estimate of +82 bcf and the 5-year average increase for the week of +80 bcf. Nat-gas inventories as of June 23 were up +14.6% y/y and +14.6% above their 5-year seasonal average.
Baker Hughes reported last Friday that the number of active U.S. nat-gas drilling rigs in the week ended June 30 fell by 6 rigs to a 1-1/4 year low of 124 rigs, down from the 3-3/4 year high of 166 rigs posted in September 2022. Active rigs have more than doubled from the record low of 68 rigs posted in July 2020 (data since 1987).
On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. For more information please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy here.
