Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Michael Cohen's Testimony Raises Questions In Trump Hush Money Trial

Former U.S. President Trump holds presser after criminal case hearing on porn star hush money charges in New York

During today's testimony, lawyers aggressively cross-examined Michael Cohen, focusing on his past behavior and statements regarding Donald Trump. The prosecution meticulously presented known facts to the jury, such as Cohen's negative portrayal as a bully and thug who capitalized on Trump's name. These details were intended to soften the impact during cross-examination.

The unknown knowns revolve around how the jury will interpret Cohen's testimony. The cross-examination delved into Cohen's public remarks about Trump, including calling him a 'boorish cartoon misogynist' and expressing a desire for Trump to be convicted. The defense aimed to challenge Cohen's credibility and bias against Trump.

The unknown unknown remains whether Trump will testify. Conflicting statements from Trump himself and his lawyers leave uncertainty about his potential appearance in court. The decision to have Trump testify under oath could have significant implications for the trial.

The prosecution presented known facts to soften the impact of cross-examination.
Lawyers aggressively cross-examined Michael Cohen on his past behavior and statements about Trump.
Cohen's negative portrayal as a bully and thug was highlighted during the trial.

The cross-examination highlighted Cohen's social media taunts towards Trump, including derogatory remarks like 'dictator douchebag' and expressing a wish for Trump to end up in prison. The defense's strategy seemed to focus on discrediting Cohen's testimony by emphasizing his negative sentiments towards Trump.

Legal experts analyzed the cross-examination tactics, noting the importance of establishing facts before attacking a witness's character. The defense's approach of immediately challenging Cohen's credibility may indicate a perceived weakness in their case. Cohen's consistent testimony supported by documents and witness accounts poses a credibility challenge for the defense.

The trial's trajectory now hinges on the jury's perception of Cohen's testimony and credibility. The defense's strategy to undermine Cohen's character suggests a shift towards discrediting his statements rather than disproving the evidence presented. The trial continues to unfold with uncertainties surrounding Trump's potential testimony and the impact of Cohen's consistent and supported statements.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.