During a recent questioning by Manhattan prosecutor Susan Hoffinger, Michael Cohen denied any intention of owning the life rights to Karen McDougal's story. Cohen clarified that he had no reason to own the life rights and explained that his actions were carried out at the direction and for the benefit of Mr. Trump.
The exchange between Cohen and Hoffinger shed light on the nature of Cohen's involvement in the situation surrounding McDougal's story. Cohen's assertion that he was acting on behalf of Trump raises questions about the extent of Trump's involvement in the matter.
McDougal's story has been a subject of public interest, and the revelation of Cohen's role in the situation adds another layer to the ongoing scrutiny. The denial of any plans to own the life rights by Cohen suggests that his actions were driven by external directives rather than personal motives.
As the investigation continues, more details may emerge regarding the dynamics between Cohen, Trump, and McDougal. The implications of Cohen's testimony could have broader implications for the individuals involved and the broader context of the case.
Overall, Cohen's denial of intending to own the life rights to McDougal's story provides a glimpse into the complexities of the situation and raises further questions about the motivations behind the actions taken by key figures in the unfolding narrative.
