During a recent court hearing, Michael Cohen, former attorney for President Donald Trump, clarified that the invoices he submitted were not based on services performed under a retainer agreement. Instead, Cohen stated that the invoices were for reimbursement, specifically in relation to the payment made to Stormy Daniels.
' 'Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger questioned Cohen about the nature of the invoices, seeking clarification on whether they were for services rendered as part of a retainer agreement. Cohen promptly responded that the invoices were related to reimbursement, indicating that they were not tied to any specific services provided.
This revelation sheds light on the financial transactions involving Cohen and his involvement in the Stormy Daniels payment. The distinction between invoices for services and reimbursement is crucial in understanding the nature of the payments made by Cohen.
As the legal proceedings continue, further details may emerge regarding the financial dealings of Michael Cohen and the implications for his legal troubles. The clarification provided during the hearing offers insight into the complexities of the case and the various financial transactions under scrutiny.
