Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
National
Miklos Bolza

Mark Latham appeals $140k award over 'vulgar' tweet

Mark Latham is appealing a judgment finding he defamed an MP who advocates for the LGBTQI community. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

Political firebrand Mark Latham contends a judge got it wrong by finding a vulgar tweet sent during an online argument defamed an independent MP who advocates for the LGBTQI community.

In September, the former federal opposition and NSW One Nation leader was ordered by the Federal Court to pay independent MP Alex Greenwich $140,000 in damages over the tweet sent during the 2023 state election.

The sexually explicit tweet was sent days after a heated online argument between the two politicians and called Mr Greenwich "disgusting".

Alex Greenwich (centre, file)
Alex Greenwich was awarded $140,000 in damages over the tweet sent during the 2023 state election. (Dan Himbrechts/AAP PHOTOS)

The post came in response to a tweet by the independent NSW politician describing the then One Nation state head as a "disgusting human being".

In September, Justice David O'Callaghan found the tweet was defamatory and resulted in a loss of standing to Mr Greenwich who experienced a barrage of online ridicule that was entirely foreseeable.

Mr Latham was ordered to pay $140,000 in damages.

He has retained solicitor Zali Burrows - who has also represented disgraced ex-deputy mayor Salim Mehajer and former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann - to appeal these findings, including the amount the court wants him to hand over.

In a notice of appeal seen by AAP, Mr Latham argued that Justice O'Callaghan was wrong to find the tweet was defamatory and contained an imputation that Mr Greenwich "engages in disgusting sexual activities".

Zali Burrows (file)
Zali Burrows is representing Mark Latham in his appeal. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

The judge also allegedly erred by finding that the independent MP suffered serious harm as a result of the post.

Mr Latham is seeking to re-agitate defences that he posted the tweet as his fair opinion which was justified as a response to an earlier attack.

Mr Greenwich declined to comment on the pending appeal.

The graphic post was widely criticised by those across the political spectrum, including One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

The online sparring match between the two politicians followed violent protests outside a church in Sydney's southwest where Mr Latham was giving a pre-election speech in March 2023.

About 250 mostly male counter-protesters violently attacked police and 15 LGBTQI protesters who had set themselves up outside the Belfield church.

Lifeline 13 11 14

Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.