Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Manhattan Prosecutors Not Opposing Trump's Sentencing Delay Proposal

Former President Donald Trump sits in Manhattan Criminal Court on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 in New York. (Michael M. Santiago/Pool Photo via AP)

Manhattan prosecutors are not explicitly opposing Donald Trump’s proposal for a sentencing delay in his hush money case until after the presidential election.

Last week, Trump asked Judge Juan Merchan to postpone his sentencing – currently set for September 18 – until after the November election, arguing in part that he won’t have enough time to appeal the judge’s decision on presidential immunity, which is expected by September 16.

In a two-page response, prosecutors wrote that, “[G]iven the defense’s newly-stated position, we defer to the Court on whether an adjournment is warranted to allow for orderly appellate litigation of that question, or to reduce the risk of a disruptive stay from an appellate court pending consideration of that question.

Trump seeks to postpone his sentencing until after the election due to immunity concerns.
Manhattan prosecutors are not opposing Trump's request for a sentencing delay.
Prosecutors defer to the court on whether an adjournment is warranted.

Prosecutors added that they are “mindful” of the security measures necessary to prepare for court appearances, and if Trump should seek an immediate appeal of the ruling, it could mean that “significant preparatory steps are taken, only to have such steps disturbed by appellate litigation.”

If Merchan agrees to move the date, it could mean that Trump won’t be sentenced until well into the future. If the judge denies Trump’s motion on immunity and Trump pursues numerous rounds of appeals in state and federal court, it would likely be several months or longer until those appeals are completed. Appeals courts could stay Trump’s sentencing until that process is over.

Trump was convicted earlier this year on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to cover up a payment to silence a porn star who said she had a sexual relationship with Trump from speaking before the 2016 election. Trump has denied the relationship.

Trump argues the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity means that certain evidence, such as the testimony of former White House aide Hope Hicks and tweets he sent while in office, should not have come before the jury. Prosecutors say the conviction should stand, saying the evidence presented at trial was “overwhelming.”

Trump’s lawyers contend that they will need more time to pursue state and federal appellate options if they lose their immunity argument, writing that one business day is “unreasonably short.” They also argue sentencing Trump would amount to “election interference” since early voting is underway in some states.

Trump previously asked Merchan to delay his sentencing initially set for July. Back then, prosecutors did not oppose moving the date, which the judge then rescheduled for next month.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.