In a recent interview, Maine Secretary of State, Shanna Belles, discussed the criticism surrounding her decision and addressed concerns that it takes away voters' right to have their voices heard. Belles emphasized her primary obligation to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law, stating that different states have different election processes.
Comparing neighboring New Hampshire, where over a dozen candidates are on the Democratic presidential primary ballot and multiple Republican candidates also feature, to Maine's two Democratic candidates and fewer than a dozen Republican candidates, Belles highlighted the varying dynamics that exist across states. She reiterated that her duty and sole consideration lie in her oath to uphold the Constitution.
When asked about potential legislative challenges to her role and the duties of the Secretary of State in Maine, Belles explained that the process currently involves the decision going to the Superior Court and potentially to the Supreme Court. However, she expressed doubt regarding a legislative directive to stop enforcing qualifications for office, as certain qualifications, such as age, residency, citizenship, and the 22nd amendment, have legal grounds and cannot be disregarded. Belles also emphasized the presence of a court process to address challenges to these qualifications.
Twitter Post On Maine Secretary of State defends decision, vows to uphold Constitution
Regarding the possibility of a legislative challenge to her role or even to the state Constitution, Belles acknowledged that the legislature has the power to change laws. As a public servant, she expressed her commitment to adhering to and following any changes in the law. However, she made it clear that her current responsibility lies in evaluating and determining the qualifications of candidates, and she will continue to fulfill her duties as dictated by the state Constitution.
While facing criticism for her decision, Secretary Belles remains steadfast in her commitment to upholding the integrity of the election process and ensuring that candidates meet the necessary qualifications for office. The controversy surrounding her actions highlights the complexities involved in carrying out election procedures in different states, as well as the importance of balancing the rights of voters with the legal obligations of public officials.
As the decision awaits review in the court system, it remains to be seen how it will impact the current election process in Maine and what potential challenges it may face. Secretary Belles' unwavering dedication to upholding the Constitution and the rule of law highlights the critical role of the Secretary of State in maintaining the integrity of elections.
