During a recent interview, Harvard Law professor Lawrence Tribe expressed concerns about Justice Alito's actions and statements, particularly in relation to recent flag incidents. Tribe highlighted Alito's past behavior during his confirmation hearing 18 years ago, where he expressed being troubled by Alito's views. The recent flag incidents, according to Tribe, raise questions about Alito's impartiality and suitability to preside over cases related to the insurrection.
Tribe criticized Alito for what he perceives as turning the Constitution upside down in various cases, including a recent 6-3 opinion where Alito disagreed with a district court's findings on racial motives in redistricting. Tribe suggested that Alito's actions may signal sympathy with insurrectionists, prompting calls for Senate Judiciary Committee hearings to assess Alito's adherence to ethical standards and good behavior.
Regarding the defense of Alito by some Republicans, who cited his wife as the reason for the flag incidents, Tribe dismissed this explanation. He emphasized that the current context of insurrection against the United States is crucial and that historical contexts, such as George Washington's flag, are irrelevant in this situation.
Tribe drew parallels to the swastika symbol, highlighting the importance of considering the current implications of symbols. He refuted claims of harassment by the left and intellectual dishonesty in criticizing Alito, pointing out that justices like Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed personal opinions but did not engage in politically charged behavior like Alito.
Tribe underscored the distinction between justices holding personal views and actively engaging in political actions, citing instances where Alito displayed political behavior, such as during Obama's State of the Union address and in defending decisions related to Roe v. Wade.
