Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Leeds Live
Leeds Live
National
David Spereall

Leeds Playhouse to get urgent £1m repairs as 'patch jobs' didn't work

An urgent £1m package to fix Leeds’ Playhouse’s leaky roof has been signed off.

Repair work will begin within days at the venue, with a Leeds City Council report saying water ingress in the popular theatre was now a “regular occurrence” in several parts of the building.

The theatre, which is owned by the council, only reopened to the public after a renovation in September 2019, before then being forced to shut again because of the Covid pandemic. The council’s report said that “patch” jobs on the roof had failed to solve the problem at the Quarry Hill venue.

Although publicly funded initially, the Playhouse will repay the money through its own reserves and grants. Noting its importance to the city, the council’s report on the works said: “The Playhouse contributes a huge amount to community development and social inclusion agendas.”

READ MORE: Neighbours of posh Leeds hotel object to 2am drinking licence bid

It added the venue has a “formidable” track record of, “Engaging with all communities, particularly the most marginalised and giving them a voice that would otherwise remain unheard.” Opened by the acclaimed actress and onetime Bond girl Dame Diana Rigg in 1990, the theatre started life as the West Yorkshire Playhouse, before being rebranded to ‘Leeds’ in 2018.

Although local authorities are normally supposed to put building contracts out to tender in the interests of value for money, the council has enacted a waiver on that process because of the urgency of the works. The report said: “The contractor has already developed a detailed knowledge and understanding of the project as a whole and, is best equipped to ensure that the works are delivered on time to coincide with the theatre’s new performance season and before the onset of the worst of the winter weather.”

The authority added that in light of this it was “Considered neither practical or offering value for money to seek to procure another specialist contractor to undertake the works.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.