According to a recent report by the Los Angeles Times, the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) faced criticism for not pre-positioning about 1,000 available firefighters and dozens of fire engines ahead of the destructive Palisades Fire on January 7. The report, based on interviews with current and former LAFD officials and internal records, revealed that only five out of more than 40 water-carrying engines were staffed before the fire escalated.
Additionally, fire officials did not order firefighters to remain on duty for a second shift, which could have doubled the number of staff available to respond to the fire. LAFD Chief Kristin Crowley defended the department's response, stating that they had to be strategic with limited resources. She emphasized that the plan in place was carefully considered to manage resources effectively across the city.
Chief Crowley also mentioned that budget cuts had impacted the LAFD's ability to maintain all mechanic positions, resulting in some 'ready reserve' engines being out of service. This limitation in resources may have contributed to the challenges faced in responding to the Palisades Fire.
The LAFD's handling of the Palisades Fire has raised concerns about the department's preparedness and resource allocation strategies in the face of wildfires. As investigations continue into the response to the fire, stakeholders are calling for a review of protocols and resource management practices to ensure better preparedness for future incidents.
