Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics

Labour U-turn on DfID would be a mistake

A UK aid label attached to boxes.
‘A dedicated development department would be a powerful, positive signal.’ Photograph: Stefan Wermuth/PA

Leaving development and aid spending within the Foreign Office (Keir Starmer considers ditching Labour pledge to reinstate DfID, 28 June) would be a mistake that would act as a drag on poverty reduction, be counterproductive for foreign policy and limit value for money from the aid budget. The world is seeing a rise in absolute poverty and inequality, so a department with expertise in fighting both is needed.

Low-income countries are distrustful of a global economic system that is rigged against them, so a dedicated development department would be a powerful, positive signal that a new government’s commitment to them reaches beyond narrow national self-interest. Finally, the record of aid spending in current years – not least on Home Office costs – demonstrates how aid can be poorly spent when poverty reduction is deprioritised and it is treated as a slush fund to cover holes in other departments’ budgets.
Katy Chakrabortty
Head of policy & advocacy, Oxfam GB

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.