LABOUR have been mocked as their bill to create Great British Energy numbered just four pages – and contained “net zero” detail about what the company would do.
MPs debated Energy Secretary Ed Miliband’s flagship project for the second time in the Commons on Thursday as politicians lambasted Labour for their “muddled” proposals, with critics accusing the Government of asking taxpayers for an £8 billion “blank cheque”.
SNP MP Dave Doogan mocked the Government for failing to communicate what the company will actually do, saying: “Talk about net zero, there’s zero detail in this bill to give us an indication of what is actually going to happen on the ground.
"It was going to sell energy to the public, then it wasn’t, then it was going to generate energy, then it wasn’t, then it is again, so I think we’re still in that space.”
Shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho (above) added: “This bill is four pages long. There’s barely anything in it.
“I don’t want to oppose this bill just for opposition’s sake but he’s provided no detail on how this bill could deliver any of his promises, let alone all of them.
“This is a four-page bill in which the Secretary of State is asking for £8bn of taxpayers’ money while setting out no investment plan, no figures for the energy that will be produced, no numbers for the energy bill savings or carbon emission reductions, not even a timeline.
“And let’s be honest, I doubt it can deliver any of the things that he’s promised, so what he’s asking for is £8bn of taxpayers’ money for a completely blank cheque, for an energy company that won’t cut your bills or turn a profit by 2030.”
Doogan (below) also hit out at the contradictory statements about Labour’s plans before coming to power.
He said: “The Government must accept that the messaging around this has been muddled at the very least during the election.
“Almost as though it was rushed through as a manifesto headline rather than a strategic development of careful, thought-out, optimised planning, but there we are.
“We understand that there’s going to be limited co-production from this company, no retail arm, no public sector comparator role. It’s going to be a provider that doesn’t do much provision, nor a decider that makes any decisions.”
Miliband gave a staunch defence of the Government’s aim to create a publicly-owned energy company, claiming that “the city of Munich owns more of our offshore wind capacity than the British Government”.
He said: “We have a simple proposition: If it’s right for the Danes, the French, the Norwegians, the Swedes, to own British energy assets, it’s right for the British people to do so as well, and that’s why we fought the election on this crucial principle, the British people should have a right to own and benefit from our natural resources.”
And the Energy Secretary argued that the creation of the company would bring down household bills, saying: “Great British Energy is a crucial tool to bring down prices for our constituents.”
The bill passed its second reading in the Commons with 348 votes in favour and 95 against. The LibDems and SNP abstained on the vote.
