The Los Angeles Times said it was laying off 115 journalists – or more than 20% of its newsroom – the day after members of Congress warned in a letter that sweeping media layoffs could undermine democracy in a high-stakes election year.
The 142-year-old newspaper, which has one of the largest print circulations in the US, has also lost its executive editor and managing editor in recent weeks. On Friday, the union representing the newsroom’s journalists held an unprecedented day-long walkout, urging Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, the paper’s billionaire owner, to reconsider a planned staff reduction in response to the paper’s struggling finances.
Young journalists of color were “disproportionately affected” by the layoffs, the Los Angeles Times Guild said in a statement, with many Black, Asian American, and Latino staffers losing their jobs, despite the Soon-Shiong family’s public commitment in 2020 to diversity in the paper’s staff, which it said “has never truly reflected the region”.
Matt Pearce, the president of Media Guild of the West, which represents the Times’ unionized journalists, wrote on X that 94 union members had been notified on Tuesday that they were being laid off, about a quarter of the union’s membership, but a smaller number than the union had originally anticipated. “We believe our decision to go on strike saved scores of newsroom jobs today,” the Los Angeles Times Guild said in a statement, citing an email from the company’s president and COO.
Statement from the @latguild on today's mass layoffs at the @latimes: pic.twitter.com/uRPWcMJqpf
— L.A. Times Guild 🦅 (@latguild) January 23, 2024
The LA Times layoffs appear to have affected a wide swathe of the paper’s reporters, editors, and managers. These included journalists and editors working on more digitally focused initiatives for younger audiences, such as the paper’s new “meme team” that had worked on TikTok content, prominent culture writers and those leading its national political coverage. Among the journalists laid off on Tuesday were the paper’s Pulitzer prize-winning DC bureau chief, Kimbriell Kelly, and its deputy DC bureau chief, Nick Baumann, who received their layoff notices on Tuesday, the day of the New Hampshire presidential primary election.
My team at De Los was gutted. I can't find the words to express how much I feel for them and the rest of my @latimes colleagues. For many, working here was THE dream job; others, uprooted their lives. For all of us, it's a privilege to tell stories that reflect our communities
— Jessica Perez (@JessicaPerezLA2) January 23, 2024
Among the journalists laid off was one of the paper’s only Indigenous editors, and many of those working on the paper’s newly launched De Los section, designed by and for Latinos, who make up roughly half of Los Angeles county’s population, and who have been historically underrepresented among the paper’s staff.
From what I can gather, it is sad to see @delosLAtimes not even get the chance to grow. I strongly believe that the future of journalism is young and Latino. Immediate returns won't happen now, but they will years from now. The runway for experimentation no longer exists.
— Julio Ricardo Varela (@julito77) January 23, 2024
The scale and the impact of the layoffs sent ripples throughout Los Angeles media circles: “My whole timeline is literally journalists of color getting let go,” one Rolling Stone journalist wrote on X.
I’ve been laid off from my job as a columnist for the LA Times today, with 100 of my best colleagues. It’s a dark day. I was the only Latina columnist for the opinion desk. Trump is looming & I’m author of Hatemonger. If you're hiring, I’m at jeangue619@gmail.com
— Jean Guerrero (@jeanguerre) January 23, 2024
LA Times journalists who lost their jobs, and those who retained them, continued to publicly criticize what they described as a chaotic and poorly managed process.
“The LA Times laid us off in an HR zoom webinar with chat disabled, no q&a, no chance to ask questions,” one former news editor wrote on X, a characterization the union confirmed in its statement.
Voluntary buyouts, like the ones the Washington Post did last year, “could have helped prevent this, but that’s not the path the company chose”, the union said.
“Voluntary buyouts … could’ve incentivized more senior staff members (who are disproportionately white) to step up and take the place of younger staff members (who are disproportionately POCs and more likely to get laid off). During our summer layoffs, buyouts went a long way toward reducing the racial impact of the cuts,” said Brian Contreras, the chair of the LA Times Guild unit council.
Both a spokesperson for the paper’s management and the union said that a subsequent buyout process required by the paper’s union contract could help offset the cuts over the coming weeks.
A spokesperson for the Times did not have additional comment.
“The economic reality of our organization is extremely challenging. Despite our owner’s willingness to continue to invest, we need to take immediate steps to improve our cash position,” Chris Argentieri, the paper’s president and COO, wrote in an email to employees on Tuesday, announcing “a significant reduction” in staff.
The union’s buyout plan was “not financially feasible”, Argentieri wrote. “It is important to emphasize that these changes are not a reflection of the hard work and dedication shown by any of our colleagues.”
The journalists’ union blamed “years of middling strategy, the absence of a publisher, and no clear direction” for the layoffs, and wrote: “It is still unclear who is in charge of our newsroom more than a week after our executive editor resigned.”
While saying that they “remain grateful for the Soon-Shiong family’s investment in the newspaper”, the journalists also wrote: “It’s clear that those entrusted to steward his family’s largesse have failed him – not the rank-and-file staff members with no say in editorial priorities.”
I’ll let people make their own individual announcements, but yes the LA Times Washington bureau was decimated. They haven’t been filling jobs for two years now and that reduced number was cut even more today. There are five reporters left covering DC https://t.co/wMb5Gxjk3S
— Sarah D. Wire (@sarahdwire) January 23, 2024
The latest round of layoffs comes after more than 70 positions – about 13% of the newsroom – were slashed last June, the Associated Press reported.
Soon-Shiong, a biotech billionaire, acquired the LA Times and other local papers in 2018, and had pledged to make his newspaper one of the “bastions of democracy” and to fight fake news, which he called the “cancer of our time”.
Soon-Shiong told the LA Times that the paper was losing $30 to $40m a year and that it was not making enough progress in growing its readership and advertising revenue in order to become financially stable. Forbes estimates Soon-Shiong’s net worth at $5.4bn.
Ten Democratic members of Congress who represent California had written Soon-Shiong a letter on Monday, saying that they were “concerned about reports of potential layoffs facing the LA Times newsroom and the effect this will have on all Angelenos, the availability of essential news and the strength of our democracy at large”.
Responding to these comments on , Soon-Shiong said that US lawmakers should be doing more to support the struggling media industry, pointing to legislation in Australia and Canada that forces companies like Google and Facebook to pay for news content shared on their platforms, as tech giants have captured wide swathes of the advertising market that used to sustain news publications.
Well, unfortunately I'm among those who were laid off by LAT today, among many other brilliant and dedicated colleagues both inside and outside our union. If you're looking for a tech reporter with experience on the AI or social media beats, I'm at briancontreras42 'at' gmail
— Brian Contreras (@_B_Contreras_) January 23, 2024
“I’d like to put the question to [lawmakers]: what can they do to help preserve a free and robust press, one that is instrumental in upholding our democracy?” he said.
The LA Times layoffs follow months of firings at media outlets across the US. A report released in early December 2023 found that the US news industry had lost 2,681 jobs through November, a higher number than in previous years.
In comments on Monday and Tuesday, Soon-Shiong said that over the past five years since he had acquired the LA Times, he had invested “hundreds of millions of dollars – approaching $1 billion” in sustaining it.
During the tumultuous years of the Covid-19 pandemic, the paper had previously avoided significant layoffs despite “losses that surpassed $100m in operational and capital expenses”, Soon-Shiong told the LA Times’ media reporter.
On Tuesday, Soon-Shiong pushed back on descriptions of what his own newspaper had characterized as “LA Times Turmoil” in a headline.
“We are not in turmoil. We have a real plan,” he said.
“Our owner has publicly said he has a plan for moving forward but has not shared it with any of us,” the journalists’ union said in its statement on Tuesday.
In advance of major presidential election year, several billionaire-owned US news publications have made significant staff layoffs. The union for journalists at Time Magazine, which is owned by the tech billionaire Marc Benioff, said that 15% of their journalists had been laid off. The Washington Post, owned by the Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, announced last year that it needed to lay off 240 employees, leading to a round of buyouts that saw high-profile journalists and editors depart the paper. Other major news outlets, from National Public Radio to Vice News to Sports Illustrated, have seen substantial layoffs and staff reductions.
This article was amended on 24 January 2023 to correct the date the Los Angeles Times journalists were laid off.
