Katie Price is moving fast with her new toyboy after sensationally dumping Kris Boyson.
But the mum-of-five has been forced to deny claims that she wants to shoot a sex tape with Charlie Drury to earn some cash.
On top of that, she's denied that she's planning baby number six with the builder.
The former glamour model, 41, risks losing her mansion after a fresh bid for bankruptcy was filed against her home last week.
A source had told Closer: "She always says sex sells , and thinks the best way for her to make money quickly would be for the pair to release a sex tape and sell it to the highest bidder — she's joked it's sex for sale on tape."
The insider added: "Katie is obsessed with being considered sexy and young, and pals know she'll got to any extreme to be seen that way."
Heat magazine had reported that she wants to be pregnant with her next baby by Christmas.
But her rep has denied both claims.
They said: "Both of these claims are completely false.
"Being a great Mum comes first to Kate and therefore there is not and will not be any negotiation taking place regarding adult content”
Last week it emerged that Katie will be whisked back to court again next month after a bankruptcy notice was placed against her £1.35million West Sussex property.
It means that unless she is able to pay off the outstanding debt against her, creditors could swoop in to take her messy mansion off her hands.
Last year Katie narrowly swerved bankruptcy when she was taken to court over non-payment of £600,000 in taxes and mortgage arrears.
Rather than being declared bankrupt, which would have had serious consequences for her businesses, she asked to take out an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) to consolidate her debt, which was accepted by the taxman in a bid to gain back the £22,000 she owed in tax.
The terms of the deal - and who she owes money to – weren't made public when it was struck on November 30 2018, but she was reportedly told to pay back £12,000 a month over the course of four years.
Katie then entered into a payment plan with an insolvency practitioner and a restriction was placed against her home in the Land Registry, meaning she was unable to sell, rent out or otherwise change the terms of her home ownership without the written consent of the practitioner.
