Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign is facing challenges related to internal cohesiveness, as a blend of loyalists to the vice president and former Obama staffers are working together on what was previously President Biden’s re-election campaign. The team, described as 'at times unwieldy,' comprises individuals from various backgrounds, resulting in competing power centers within the campaign.
While Mike Donilon, the main architect of Biden’s campaign messaging, has returned to the White House, Harris has retained most of Biden’s other campaign staff. Additionally, she has incorporated her own team members and aides from Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign, creating a complex dynamic within the campaign structure.
This contrasts with Biden’s more insular campaign team, which was characterized by a smaller group of longtime aides making key decisions. The effort to integrate Biden’s and Harris’ teams has led to confusion regarding leadership roles, with questions arising about who holds the primary authority within the vice president’s circle.
Concerns have been raised about role clarity within the campaign, particularly among lower-level staff members. The involvement of various entities has contributed to a sense of disorientation, with some individuals feeling uncertain about their responsibilities.
Despite these challenges, the short timeframe until Election Day has reportedly prevented significant tensions from escalating. The fast-paced nature of the campaign has resulted in occasional clashes but has not been characterized as intentional or malicious.
While some Biden campaign aides acknowledge Harris’ appeal and the enthusiasm she brings to the ticket, there are reservations about defending her past progressive positions on issues such as 'Medicare-for-all' and fracking. These stances, along with those of other Democrats, played a role in Biden securing the 2020 nomination.
Instead of overhauling Biden’s campaign team, Harris has shifted the messaging focus from 'democracy' to themes of 'freedom' and 'future.' This adjustment reflects an attempt to align the campaign’s narrative with Harris’ vision and priorities.
