Attorneys in a high-profile trial in New York have successfully selected a jury of 12 New Yorkers, a crucial step before opening statements can commence. However, the process is not yet complete as up to six alternates need to be seated as well. So far, one alternate has been chosen, with more to follow.
Jury selection is a critical phase of any trial, as these individuals will be responsible for hearing the evidence presented and ultimately deciding the outcome of the case. Alternates play a vital role in ensuring that the trial can proceed smoothly in case any of the seated jurors are unable to continue for various reasons.
According to New York criminal procedure law, there are specific circumstances under which an alternate may replace a juror during the trial. These include instances where a juror falls ill or becomes incapacitated, is no longer available to serve, is found to be grossly unqualified, fails to appear in court, or engages in misconduct of a significant nature that does not warrant a mistrial.
The law also mandates that alternates must meet the same qualifications as regular jurors and undergo a similar examination process. The selection of alternates will be conducted by the judge and the attorneys involved in the case after all 12 jurors have been seated.
While alternates will be present for the entire trial and hear all the evidence, they will not participate in the deliberation process. Their role is to step in if needed to ensure the trial can proceed smoothly to its conclusion.
