Judge Juan Merchan questioned Donald Trump's lawyers about the discovery issue related to the documents they sought from the US Attorney's Office. The judge pointed out that the issue was not mentioned earlier despite the subpoena being filed on January 18.
Trump's legal team raised the discovery matter on February 15, prompting the judge to inquire why it wasn't addressed sooner. In response, Trump's attorney Todd Blanche explained that they were unsure about the intervention they could have sought on February 15 since they were uncertain about the information they would receive from federal prosecutors.
The exchange between Judge Merchan and Trump's lawyers shed light on the timeline of events regarding the discovery request. The discrepancy in timing raised questions about the handling of the subpoena and the communication between the legal teams involved.
It is evident from the proceedings that the discovery issue played a significant role in the court session, with Judge Merchan seeking clarification on the delay in addressing the matter. The response provided by Trump's attorney highlighted the challenges faced in navigating the legal process and making informed decisions based on available information.
As the case unfolds, the handling of discovery requests and the communication between the parties involved will continue to be scrutinized. The interaction between the judge and the legal representatives underscores the importance of transparency and diligence in legal proceedings, especially in high-profile cases like this.
