Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
Alex Mitchell

Judge faces cases ban after scathing watchdog report

A watchdog considered referring the actions of Judge Robert Newlinds to parliament. (Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS)

A judge could be pulled from hearing criminal cases after a watchdog found he abused his power when criticising NSW's top prosecutor and vilifying a sexual assault complainant.

District Court Judge Robert Newlinds had publicly criticised the NSW Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in his judgment on a sexual assault case in 2023, suggesting the trial had been run in a way that was unfair to the accused.

Throughout the trial, Judge Newlinds lambasted the crown's case and repeatedly called it "hopeless", while he said of the alleged sexual assault victim: "she wrongly thinks that if you have sex with someone and you can't remember, that's sexual assault".

The accused in the matter was acquitted after a jury trial.

The Judicial Commission - NSW's judge watchdog - said Judge Newlinds' actions were almost worthy of being referred to parliament so it could consider removing him from his position.

Centre District Court of NSW
The Chief Judge of the District Court will consider recommendations of the Judicial Commission. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

But instead it referred the matter back to the Chief Judge of the District Court, while recommending it was inappropriate for him to sit in state criminal matters for the foreseeable future.

The initial complaint, made by NSW Director of Public Prosecutions Sally Dowling, covered four allegations, including Judge Newlinds' "incompetence", a failure to be judicially impartial, unreasonable criticism and vilification of sexual assault complainant and baseless criticism of the DPP.

The Judicial Commission's three-person panel found all four of those complaints were substantiated, finding he had a "generalised prejudice" against the crown that would make it inappropriate for him to sit in criminal trials.

"The judge's hot-headed, impulsive and undisciplined intervention in the course of argument and critical statement in various places of his judgement about the director … raise serious concerns about the judge's capacity to adhere to appropriate standards of judicial conduct," the report read.

"We are concerned about an apparent lack of proper appreciation by the judge of the need to conduct himself in court in an important, even-handed and respectful way."

Judge Newlinds accepted a number of the allegations against him were warranted and admitted he "ought not to have said" some of the things.

But the report-writers said they were "concerned" about his "dismissal as trivial" a number of the aspects of the complaint.

He has been contacted for comment.

Judge Newlinds was appointed to the NSW District Court in 2023, having predominantly served in commercial law.

The report noted at one point in the trial he said: "I don't do criminal law, you know that, don't you?"

The NSW District Court has been contacted for comment.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.