In a recent legal proceeding, the prosecution and defense engaged in a discussion regarding the definition of legitimate press function, particularly in relation to the actions of AMI, the publisher of the National Enquirer. The debate centered around whether AMI's activities, such as publishing articles and engaging in tasks like solicitation letters and seeking new subscribers, fell within the scope of normal legitimate press function.
During the proceedings, Trump's attorney emphasized that AMI's actions with regards to Karen McDougal were in line with their agreement and constituted activities that are part of the normal press function. The defense sought to clarify this point to the court.
However, Judge Juan Merchan raised a question about the phrase 'legitimate press function,' suggesting that it was a broad concept that could potentially be omitted from the discussion. The judge expressed willingness to retain the content before and after that phrase while considering removing it.
Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo weighed in, stating that he believed some of the language used in the discussion was unnecessary. Despite this, Judge Merchan indicated that including the line about legitimate press function would not cause any harm.
The exchange between the prosecution, defense, and the judge highlighted the nuances of defining legitimate press function within the context of AMI's activities. The legal debate underscored the complexities involved in determining what constitutes normal tasks for a publisher and the importance of clarity in legal language.
