Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
National
Johanna Chisholm

Josh Hawley says women are ‘people who give birth’ then gets in a muddle over vaginas

Getty Images

A question about defining “woman”, one that baffled Republicans last month during Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearings and was also labelled by Senator Marsha Blackburn as “fundamental” to being able to answer, is proving to be a stumbling block for GOP lawmakers to provide a succinct answer to.

One in particular, Sen Josh Hawley, who spent his time during the confirmation hearings grilling Judge Jackson over her record on punishing sex offenders, seemed not only unable to provide a clear answer to the question that only weeks earlier he and fellow Republicans on the Judiciary Committee panned, but genuinely confused about human anatomy works.

In a series of hallway interviews with the HuffPost the outlet asked Republicans who sat on the Judiciary Committee the same question that they’re House and Senate colleagues have mocked as being simple and straightforward: define woman.

While their answers ranged from textbook Republican, Sen Thom Tillis responded to the question by saying “my wife”, to the more genetic, Sen Chuck Grassley echoed the definition Sen Blackburn provided initially, “A woman is born with two X-chromosomes”, Sen Hawley’s comments were perhaps the most quizzical, and have led to the internet erupting in a widespread panning of what seemed to be his grave misunderstanding of human anatomy.

When prompted by the reporter’s question, Mr Hawley boldly began by explaining that womanhood is inherently tied to a person’s ability to give birth, saying: “Someone who can give birth to a child, a mother, is a woman,” Mr Hawley said, before adding “someone who has a uterus is a woman. It doesn’t seem that complicated to me.”

The reporter then poked a hole in his logic by asking if a woman has had her uterus removed, a procedure that the CDC estimates 20 million people in the country have done, then would that disqualify them from being included in Mr Hawley’s definition?

A confused Mr Hawley responded to the question by asking another question: “Yeah. Well, I don’t know, would they?” and then when pressed further by the reporter about whether or not a woman would still be defined as such if she, for instance, lost her reproductive organs to cancer, he again answered with a question: “I mean, a woman has a vagina, right?”

Reactions online to the Arkansas Republican politician’s stumbling were swift and unrelenting, with many taking time to point out the irony of the lawmaker struggling to answer the question he and his colleagues had for weeks mocked as being straightforward.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.