Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - US
The Guardian - US
Entertainment
Edward Helmore

Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial: jurors hear conflicting accounts of marriage

Johnny Depp inside a courtroom in Fairfax, Virginia, on 12 April.
Johnny Depp inside a courtroom in Fairfax, Virginia, on 12 April. Photograph: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images

Contradictory, explosive accounts of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s tumultuous three-year marriage have been presented to jurors on the opening day of Depp’s libel case against his ex-wife in a US court, with Depp’s lawyers accusing Heard of fabricating domestic violence claims against him to advance her own career.

Heard’s attorneys, meanwhile, argued that her allegations are true, she had a right to express her views, “and all Mr Depp has wanted to do is humiliate Amber, to haunt her, to wreck her career”.

Opposing profiles of the movie stars – with Heard’s counsel presenting Depp as “an obsessed ex-husband hellbent on revenge” and Heard described as a woman who would “resort to physical violence, throwing things, to prevent Mr Depp from leaving” – were heard during opening statements.

“Today, his name is associated with a lie. A statement issued by his former wife,” Depp’s attorney Ben Chew said on Tuesday. “You will learn during the trial that Miss Heard’s accusations were prompted by Mr Depp’s request for a divorce.”

Amber Heard looks on inside the courtroom on 12 April.
Amber Heard looks on inside the courtroom on 12 April. Photograph: Reuters

Heard’s attorney later said they would present evidence during the trial to show that Depp had described “the violent side of himself as the monster” while engaging in “crushing drug and alcohol abuse”.

“Amber Heard never wanted to unearth for the public who the real Johnny Depp is,” her attorney Ben Rottenborn said. “But that’s going to come out over the course of this trial.”

The estranged couple arrived at the court in Fairfax, Virginia – Depp in a dark blue suit, black shirt and cream tie; Heard in a grey blazer with her hair in a low bun – amid a throng of fans, whom they have both been instructed to avoid.

Depp’s attorneys claimed Heard’s opinion article in the Washington Post, published on the eve of the cinema release of Aquaman, in which she acted, “falsely and unfairly cast Mr Depp as a villain”. The actor, said his attorney Camille Vasquez, will “go to his grave knowing that whatever he does there will always be people who believe he abused a woman”.

Vasquez also accused Heard of stagecraft. “She has been living and breathing this lie for years now,” she said. “She is preparing to give the performance of a lifetime in this trial.”

Heard’s attorney’s countered that Depp’s accusations against his ex-wife were designed to “mislead you” and their client’s case was about her right to free speech under the first amendment.

“That’s what you’re being asked to decide,” said J Ben Rottenborn, an attorney for Heard. The lawyer also noted that Depp is trying to prove “the words Miss Heard used were about him and were false … and he can’t do that”.

“Mr Depp’s team is going to try to turn this case into a soap opera. Why, I’m not sure, because the evidence isn’t pretty for Mr Depp.”

The mudslinging, which will probably last seven weeks, is unlikely to do either actor’s career any favors.

Both claim their reputations have been significantly damaged by the other, but it is Depp who brought the defamation action on the basis of the 2018 Washington Post article in which Heard wrote about domestic violence towards women – and implied, according to Depp, that he was the perpetrator.

Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 35, for $50m over the article; Heard is counter-suing for $100m. For Depp to prevail, jurors must “prove by clear and convincing evidence” that Heard knowingly made false claims – a standard of proof that is typical of civil cases and is somewhat less rigorous that “beyond reasonable doubt”.

Trial observers have noted that Depp is not suing the Washington Post itself, which some have said suggests that his action may not be fundamentally about libel, but about the messy end of a turbulent marriage acted out in public.

“These fictitious claims were never made at the onset of Amber’s allegations in 2016, and only advantageously surfaced years later once she was sued for defamation after noting in her op-ed that she was a victim of ‘sexual violence”, a spokesperson for Depp said later.

“This follows a pattern of her elaborate, erroneous claims which have continued to change and evolve over time for the purpose of Hollywood shock value of which Amber has mastered and used to exploit a serious social movement,” they added.

Some famous faces are expected to testify, including the actor Paul Bettany, who texted with Depp about Heard; the actor James Franco, who allegedly once asked Heard about bruises on her face after a row with Depp; the actor Ellen Barkin; and the Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, who is Heard’s former boyfriend.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.