House Republicans are facing pressure from within their party to hold a vote on legislation supporting in vitro fertilization (IVF) before the upcoming November elections. The push for this vote comes as some Republicans in competitive races seek to demonstrate their support for IVF, which has come under scrutiny following a recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling.
Despite efforts from multiple GOP lawmakers, Speaker Mike Johnson has been hesitant to bring IVF legislation to the floor. Concerns about passing the legislation in the narrowly held Republican majority and potential political repercussions have contributed to Johnson's reluctance.
While some House Republicans have filed bills in support of IVF, there has been a lack of concrete action on the issue. The hesitancy among party leadership appears to be thawing, with some members acknowledging the need for Republicans to take a public stance on IVF.
Former President Donald Trump has expressed support for IVF, and House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik emphasized the party's backing for IVF. However, Senate Republicans previously voted down a bill guaranteeing access to IVF nationwide.
Despite claims of universal support for IVF within the House GOP conference, some members have expressed disinterest in the topic or emphasized other legislative priorities. However, GOP Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks recently introduced a bill offering a tax credit for IVF expenses.
Several bills and resolutions related to IVF have been introduced in the House, with varying levels of support and policy goals. Democratic Rep. Susan Wild led a bill to ensure IVF access, garnering some Republican cosponsors following the Alabama ruling.
While some Republican-led efforts are symbolic resolutions expressing support for IVF, others, like a bipartisan bill introduced by GOP Rep. Zach Nunn, aim to protect access to fertility treatments.
Rank-and-file members across the GOP conference see voting on pro-IVF legislation as beneficial, particularly before the election. However, opinions vary on the necessity of forcing a vote on IVF before the election, with some members viewing it as a political move.
Overall, the debate within the House GOP over IVF legislation reflects broader discussions on reproductive health care and legislative priorities as the November elections approach.
