data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ca06/5ca061a8327969b7c9b4088c9095e84aa2f40c7d" alt=""
House Republicans are considering reforms to federal benefits that would expand work requirements for a broader segment of Americans. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., is set to introduce the 'America Works Act of 2025,' which aims to mandate single, able-bodied Americans aged 18 to 65 on the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) to engage in at least 20 hours per week of work or work-related education.
The proposed bill includes exemptions for adults with dependent children under the age of 7. Johnson emphasized the importance of work, training, and education in lifting individuals out of poverty, stating that these elements are crucial for welfare programs to serve as pathways out of poverty.
House Republicans are gearing up to negotiate spending cuts to advance President Donald Trump's agenda through the budget reconciliation process. This process allows the majority party to pass budgetary priorities with minimal support from the opposing side.
The bill directs the House Committee on Agriculture to identify areas for spending cuts, with a target of reducing SNAP spending by at least $230 billion. The legislation also grants the Department of Agriculture the authority to exempt individuals in counties with unemployment rates exceeding 10%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c228b/c228bf38b4a569ea28ee546fb0e0edc9ef3889b9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ca06/5ca061a8327969b7c9b4088c9095e84aa2f40c7d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b9d7/1b9d73df7800361a6fdf89b65f4827ca1f3f85fc" alt=""
Johnson clarified that the bill's primary focus is on social change rather than fiscal savings, emphasizing the positive impact of work requirements on improving lives and helping individuals escape poverty.
The proposed legislation would remove exemptions for young adults who aged out of foster care and veterans, which were previously included in bipartisan negotiations. Johnson argued that these exemptions hinder progress towards financial stability for these groups.
Exceptions would still apply to pregnant women, individuals with disabilities, and those residing in high-unemployment areas. Johnson highlighted the need for consistent eligibility requirements across all demographics to promote equal opportunities for financial advancement.