The Home Affairs Minister has dismissed demands from the Labor Party for an urgent intelligence briefing on the controversial security pact between China and Solomon Islands, after yesterday alleging the deal could have been timed to hurt the Coalition's electoral chances.
Karen Andrews accused her political opponents of misinterpreting her comments, insisting she was merely raising questions about why the deal was signed while the Australian government was in caretaker mode.
That is despite noting on Wednesday morning that China was "very clearly aware that we're in a federal election campaign".
The deal between the governments in Beijing and Honiara has fuelled concerns China could seek to expand its military presence in the South Pacific.
Ms Andrews said the security agreement had become one of the main issues the Prime Minister and senior ministers were being grilled on.
"Why in the middle of a federal election campaign is all this coming to light?" she asked on Wednesday.
"I mean, we talk about political interference — and that has many forms — so I think we need to be very much aware of what Beijing is doing, what its plans are, what it's trying to achieve in the actions it's taking in the Solomons, but not exclusively in the Solomons."
The comments sparked fury from the opposition, with Shadow Home Affairs Minister Kristina Keneally saying Ms Andrews's was indulging in "conspiratorial fantasies and unhinged commentary".
"[The comments were] offered with no proof, offered with no reference to intelligence," Senator Keneally told reporters on Thursday.
"If Karen Andrews does not have intelligence briefings suggesting that there have been attempts at foreign interference in our election campaign, then she needs to clarify that to the public right now.
"And if she does have such briefings, we are in caretaker mode.
"And I remind her that the ASIO director-general has already made clear that such briefings should be provided to both the opposition and the government during the caretaker period."
Senator Keneally had written to the minister's office asking for a briefing.
Ms Andrews attempted to return serve on Thursday evening.
"And what I indicated is that questions seriously should be asked about the timing of that agreement.
"I know that there's a lot of interpretations on what I said, but what I did say is that there should be questions asked about the timing of that — that is an eminently sensible thing for any nation to be doing."
The security pact has dominated debate over the past week of the election campaign, with Labor accusing the Coalition of a major foreign policy blunder in Australia's backyard.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison has argued his government acted appropriately and denied accusations it was caught napping, rejecting suggestions from the opposition it erred by not dispatching Foreign Minister Marise Payne to try to scuttle the deal.
Mr Morrison has tried to tie the development into the Coalition's broader campaign narrative on national security, warning a Labor government would be more likely to yield to Chinese influence in the region.
But Labor has seized upon the issue, labelling it a further example of negligence and complacency at the heart of the federal government.
Earlier this week, the Labor announced it would increase Australia's aid spend in the Pacific by half a billion dollars if it was elected.
