Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Independent UK
The Independent UK
National
Tom Pilgrim

Harry’s High Court claim against Mail publisher can continue, judge rules

PA Wire

Prince Harry has won the right to continue his legal battle against the Daily Mail publisher.

The Duke of Sussex is one of seven high-profile people, including Sir Elton John and Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon, who has brought legal action Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL).

Others who have brought allegations against the publisher include David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley and Sir Simon Hughes.

They are accusing the paper of carrying out or commissioning unlawful information gathering, which ANL “firmly” denies.

Allegations include the hiring of private investigators to place listening devices inside people’s homes and cars, dishonestly obtaining medical and financial information and accessing and listening into phone conversations.

In his ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Nicklin said ANL “has not been able to deliver a ‘knockout blow’ to the claims of any of these claimants”.

He continued: “Fair resolution of any limitation defence…must await trial.”

Sir Elton John has also brought a legal claim against the Daily Mail publisher (Aaron Chown/PA)
— (PA Wire)

In his 95-page-judgment, he said that each of the seven people in the claim have a “real prospect” of demonstrating that ANL concealed “relevant facts” that would have allowed them to bring a claim against the publisher earlier.

During a court hearing in March, the duke made a surprise appearance at the Royal Courts of Justice, where his lawyer David Sherborne argued that those bringing legal action were “thrown off the scent”, having believed “categorical denials” from ANL.

Prince Harry arriving at the Royal Courts of Justice in March
— (Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved)

In her witness statement, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, the mother of murdered Stephen Lawrence, had said she felt “played for a fool” by the Daily Mail, believing them to be “the good people, not the bad”.

Associated Newspapers has strongly denied the allegations, with Adrian Beltrami KC arguing that the high-profile individuals could have used “reasonable diligence” to discover if they had a potential claim before October 2016.

The lawyer said the legal action against it has “no real prospects of succeeding” and is “barred” under a legal period of limitation.

At a preliminary hearing, the publisher asked a judge to rule in its favour without a trial, arguing the legal challenges against it were brought “far too late”.

Baroness Lawrence said she felt ‘played for a fool’ by the Daily Mail
— (PA)

However, the Mr Justice Nicklin ruled the claims can proceed, paving the way for a further court hearing at a later date.

The case is one of six legal battles Harry has brought since leaving the Royal Family, with his civil litigation also including a legal challenge against the Home Office regarding the provision of his personal security.

Alongside actor Hugh Grant, he is suing NGN, the publisher of The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, over unlawful information gathering, as well as seeking damages from MGN, the publisher of the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror and Sunday People.

The 39-year-old had also brought two cases against the Home Office over security arrangements for himself and his family when they are in UK. This follows a February 2020 decision which stated he would no longer be given the “same degree” of personal protective security when visiting.

He is also suing ANL over a February 2022 Mail on Sunday article about his legal fight with the Home Office.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.