Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Newslaundry
Newslaundry
National
NL Team

Hafta 478: TM Krishna awards row, Kejriwal’s arrest and PMLA Act

This week, Newslaundry’s Abhinandan Sekhri, Raman Kirpal, and Manisha Pandey are joined by music producer and public health consultant Dr Aiswarya Rao.

On the controversy around TM Krishna being conferred the Sangita Kalanidhi award by the Madras Music Academy and the Carnatic music fraternity’s response, Rao says it is an “intra-Brahmin musician dispute”. One faction wants to “take Carnatic music to the masses”, while the other wants to maintain its “hegemony”.  

On Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest, Manisha says the PMLA Act is “scary”. “You cannot get bail in PMLA till the court is satisfied that there is prima facie no case.” 

This and a lot more. Tune in!

Hafta letters: Electoral bond reports, extremism, data leaks

We have a page for subscribers to send letters to our shows. If you want to write to Hafta, click here

Check out the Newslaundry store and flaunt your love for independent media. 

Download the Newslaundry app.

General elections are around the corner, and Newslaundry and The News Minute have ambitious plans. Click here to support us.

Song: Kurai Ondrum Illai

Timecodes

00:05:40 - Headlines

00:12:20  - TM Krishna’s Sangita Kalanidhi award controversy

00:31:32  - Arvind Kejriwal arrest

00:59:57  - Letters

01:16:13    - Recommendations

References

General Elections 2024 Fund

India Summons US Diplomat Over Comments On Arvind Kejriwal's Arrest

Recommendations

Dr Aiswarya Rao

Happy Valley

Blue Lights

Deadloch

Manisha

Project Electoral Bond

Raj Kamal Jha at Ramnath Goenka Awards

The Golden Years: The Many Joys of Living a Good Long Life

Raman

JNU students' union polls

The dream chasers who got inducted into a war

Limited edition baseball cap gives investigators key leads in Bengaluru Rameshwaram Cafe blast

Abhinandan 

The Global Story: Curse of the world's fastest growing economy

Check out our previous Hafta recommendations.

Produced and recorded by Aryan Mahtta, edited by Hassan Bilal. 

Hafta 478

Manisha: [00:00:00] This is a News Laundry podcast, and you're

listening to n

Abhinandan: Welcome to Hafta when we are recording on a we day at

four 30 in the afternoon. Uh, and this is because tomorrow is a very busy

day for a variety of reasons. Most importantly, because our exec, uh, our

managing editor, Manisha, is back from a holiday. Hello. Please notice

as, uh, who was it? Sharad Yadav or Mulayam Singh who had said

Parkati?

What was that? Remember that whole thing? Who? I forget. Mulayam

Singh, Mulayam Singh. No, no. I think it was Sharad Yadav. Sharad

Yadav. Was it Parkati Mela? Yeah, Parkati Mela. He had said, basically,

he had a problem with women who have haircuts. So, here's what I

gathered. But, uh, so she's back and, uh, but it has been, uh, Manisha, a

very hectic week of news.

I [00:01:00] don't know whether you've been following news or during

holidays, do you disconnect?

Manisha: Well, yeah, I really wanted to disconnect, but then there's so

much Too tempting. Yeah, it was just the arrest, especially Kejriwal's

arrest, I think was, it was hard to not read on it and follow what was

happening.

Abhinandan: So Manisha is back also in the studio.

I am your editor in chief, Aman Kripal. Welcome, Aman sir. And joining

us on, uh, the Zoom connection is Dr. Aishwarya Rao. Welcome, Dr.

Rao. Hi. So, uh, you're a public health consultant and pediatrician. Uh,

you have also been a Carnatic, Carnatic. I don't know how you

pronounce this because many people say Carnatic, but I'm thinking

they're giving an accent.

Carnatic. I say Carnatic because that sounds very Indian, but I don't

know. Carnatic. It sounds like Punjabi. It

Manisha: sounds very Punjabi, so. Carnatic. Carnatic Cafe. She's doing

well there. You know, Karnataka. Karnataka.

Abhinandan: Uh, so she's a producer in multiple albums that she's

produced, and she's also the founder of the not for profit Better World

Shelter for Women.

with disabilities. So, uh, thank you for coming and thank you for all the

work you [00:02:00] do. It's my pleasure to be on your show. Great. Uh,

now we will get into the headlines and then discuss something that has,

you know, it just started off with what I thought was a small

disagreement. It's exploded into, you know, really big mainstream news,

which is SM um, you know, award that he was given.

And, We will get a little more understanding of it because, yeah, my

understanding on this is limited. So Dr. Rao can tell us a little more

about that and what is the significance, et cetera. Uh, but I'll start off with

the appeal that our election fund, which the News Minute and News

Laundry will jointly be covering, two of the projects have been topped up.

So thank you so much for that. Really appreciate it. Cause the second

project got topped up last weekend. I'm hoping that at least two more

can get topped up this weekend. And if you go to the News Laundry, uh,

app, or if you go to the News Laundry website, You will see there is a

button called election fund and in that there are three budgets given four

budgets given one is another election show [00:03:00] where Manisha

And Dhanya will be traveling and giving you on ground reports and you

know, the buzz of what's happening with local journalists.

That's a very popular show because usually it's just journalists sitting in

Delhi telling us what's happening. They go to the city and get local

journalists to tell us. Then there's one project called Gendered Polls,

which is 47 crore women are eligible to vote in this general election and

they'll possibly outnumber their male counterparts in elections to come.

Modi's return hinges on that vote. So we'll be doing several reports and

analysis on that. Then ground reports from battleground states, which is

Bihar, Bengal, Maharashtra. Uh, and Karnataka and poll watchdogs,

which is big ads. You know what the media's role has been in this. So

I'm hoping you guys top it up while I'm recording this.

It is the media watchdog, which is most close to being topped up. And

the one that's furthest is the one on battleground states. So please do

[00:04:00] contribute because we don't take any ads. And there's one

thing that the electoral bond story has taught us, which. Raman sir's

team, Supriya's team at Scroll and Dhanya's team at Newsminute did

such a fantastic job on.

There could not be a clearer quid pro quo. Big corporations are taking

loans from banks, you know, defaulting on their loans and giving money

to political parties. It is bizarre the kind of stuff that's happening.

Someone is getting a contract for infrastructure, you know, project for

2000 crores and giving a couple of hundred crores to the ruling party.

It is just bizarre. And this is an environment where even news is being

funded by these very corporations. So unless you fund news. You know,

there's no point in claiming that we are this democracy with very robust

institutions because news is one of the most important aspects of a

democracy and that is completely hijacked by government ads and

those who are giving money to the governments and to news, then

what's left?[00:05:00]

Manisha: And the nuisance team tells me that there has been no debate

on this. Most of the prominent prime time anchors have not done shows

on electoral

Abhinandan: bonds. They are debating. We did two stories on that.

They are debating a tweet about Kangana Ranaut. Yes. Yeah. Imagine

that, that, that has taken in one night, six primetime debates, but the

obvious quid pro quo that is shown in these bonds, no one

Manisha: discussions that they say did happen was on DMK.

How much money DMT? So that was one.

Abhinandan: So do contribute. Uh, so thank you so much. Hafta

continues to be free for a couple of weeks. I'm not sure whether it's

going to be free this week also. Uh, so do contribute, uh, with that,

Manisha will give us the headlines and then she'll continue with the

discussion with Dr.

Rao.

Manisha: Aam Aadmi Party Chief and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind

Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate in connection to

the Delhi excise policy case. Following his arrest, Delhi Minister Atishi

said Kejriwal will continue to remain the Chief Minister. There's been

some kind of controversy around that.[00:06:00]

whether he should continue or not. His wife, meanwhile, has given two

press conferences.

Raman: They are legally weighing it, whether he can be or he cannot

be. But in the meanwhile, uh, you know, he's given two instructions from

the jail.

Manisha: But now we have two chief ministers in jail, Hemanth Soren

and Arvind Kejriwal.

The Election Commission on, of India on Thursday published the

complete electoral bond data given to it by the State Bank of India on

orders of the Supreme Court. This included bond numbers that helped

donors to be matched with the political parties they donated to. BRS was

taken to Tihar Jail after a Delhi court on Tuesday sent her to judicial

custody till April 9th in connection with the Delhi excise policy linked

money laundering case.

In fact, in the electoral bond stories, I uh, read one story that we did that

one of the approvers had also donated to the BJP Ah, yes. In the Delhi

excise policy case. Yes. Climate activist. So Chu has ended his fast in

lay after 21 days, the protest was [00:07:00] aimed at demanding

inclusion of Ladda in the sixth studio of the Constitution and stated for

the region.

The fast though, has not ended. It is the first phase of the fast. And now

women, uh, will protest and for 10 days taking turns fast. For 10 days.

Yeah, for 10 days. Yeah. Karna Singer, TM Krishna. is being conferred

with the prestigious Sangeeta Kala Nidhi title by the Madras Music

Academy at its 2024 conference.

This sparked a sort of a controversy. Two musicians, Rajini and Gayatri,

have resolved to boycott the conference in protest, uh, of Krishna, who's

a vocal critic of Sangh Parivar. In their letter, they wrote that, you know,

how he's demeaned our tradition. He's said anti Brahmin stuff. He's

eulogized Periyar and stuff like that.

And the academy also shot back a letter saying that we stand by our

resolve to So we can have a longer discussion on this. Now, lots of 2024

election related stories. The BJP released its fifth list of candidates for

the upcoming Lok Sabha election. Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay, who

resigned from the Calcutta High Court and joined the BJP, has been

quickly given a party ticket [00:08:00] from Tamluk constituency in West

Bengal.

Kangana Ranaut's long audition to become the member of parliament,

finally, born. Finally, she's got the role of her lifetime. She's going to be

contesting from Mandi. In

Abhinandan: fact, um, it's interesting the graphic that Akash Banerjee

Deshbhakt put out of her last 10 films and the box office collections.

They've all tanked.

Now, clearly election is a good, uh, politics

Manisha: is a good option. And there's been a lot of controversy around

that also because, uh, Supriya Srinath of Congress and Mrinal Pandey,

who's a senior journalist, made some comments about her and Mandi.

Which were pretty unsavory to my mind, but that became quite a bit of

news.

Abhinandan: We must clarify that she claims that it was not the,

because it wasn't her. It was the official Congress handle.

Manisha: It was her official handle, but she says that her team members

and some heads of role within her team and they delete, she deleted it.

So Naveen Jindal is going to be contesting from [00:09:00] Kurukshetra.

He's joined the BJP. That was quick, very difficult times for Sudhir

Choudhury. Kerala BJP President K. Surendran will be the party

candidate against Rahul Gandhi in Wayanad constituency. Meanwhile,

Menaka Gandhi will continue to contest elections from Sultanpur. Her

son Varun Gandhi has been dropped from Pillivit.

The Congress has also announced more candidates. Uh, they fielded

UP Congress President Ajay Rai from Varanasi to contest against Prime

Minister Narendra Modi. Rajya Sabha MP Digvijay Singh has been

fielded from Rajgad and former BSP leader Danish Ali from Amroha.

The Karnataka government on Saturday moved the Supreme Court

alleging that the centre had not extended financial assistance to the

state for drought management.

And there's a lot of centre versus state headlines. After this, we've had

the Kerala government moving the Supreme Court against President

Murmu for withholding assent to state bills. And in Tamil Nadu, Governor

Arun Ravi finally had to listen to the Supreme Court and administer oath

to K. Ponmudi as State Minister.

This was a day after Chief Justice of India, Justice [00:10:00]

Chandrachur slammed him for defying the

Abhinandan: Supreme Court. He was given 24 hours. Yeah. Otherwise

he said he'll be forced to put contempt. This Ravi is one of the most

bizarre, brazen, yeah, shameless governors. Even by the same

standard. Those standards that governors have set historically.

Manisha: Candidates from left groups on Sunday swept the Jawaharlal

Nehru University Student Union election, with the United Left winning

three posts and Birsa Ambedkar Phule Students Association emerging

victorious on one seat.

Raman: The, the, This woman who won general secretary, she, uh, is,

uh, fighting on, uh, you know, uh, different party.

Uh, I mean, student party and, uh, they, their candidate was dropped the

left parties. Yeah. So left parties, they decided to, you know,

Abhinandan: back her because, and that candidate was dropped at

some like two in the morning or something like that was just a few hours

left for the yes. But the funny thing is that some of our wonderful news

channels were running tickers.

That, you [00:11:00] know, A BVP sweeps, gen U before general

election is this, uh, is, is this what looks like, et cetera, et cetera. They're

won by huge margin. Right. And they didn't even in one seat, you know,

uh, news channels have just gone insane. It's like they'll just run

anything

Raman: see in, in, uh, in, uh, Paul where you have just 3000 votes and

you win by 900 votes.

It's a huge margin. Mm. Yeah. 900 is huge.

Manisha: Yeah. Yeah. A day after the center notified a fact checking

unit under the Press Information Bureau to identify fake news about the

government, the Supreme Court stayed the operation of the notification.

This will be until the Bombay High Court takes a final decision on

petitions challenging the 2023 amendment to the IT rules.

And the

Abhinandan: biggest, the problem with this is that the government will

decide who is telling the truth about their own policies. So technically the

fact checking and because of the history of this whole PIB fact check

and news on his other story. Anything

Manisha: inconvenient is fake, basically. And Kunal Kamra [00:12:00]

was one of the key petitioners in this.

Over 130 people were killed in Moscow on Friday after gunmen opened

fire inside a concert hall with automatic weapons. Terrorist organization,

Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack.

Abhinandan: But Putin is saying, no, it's Ukrainians at all. They're

saying, no, we've done it. Ukraine is involved. So that's what the news is

now coming to what's happening in the world of Carnatic music.

Uh, Dr. Rao, could you just tell us, A, what is the controversy about, you

know, the history of this organization, which is conferring the award? Is

it, you know, such a big political issue, uh, in, in the world, in the world

of, uh, Carnatic music, or is it just noise because ingratiate themselves

in front of the right wing government or whatever it

Aiswarya: is?

I think the latter is true. It is not a big deal at all. You know, for a long

time, the, uh, the controversy erupted like 10 days ago [00:13:00] and,

uh, like Manisha just briefed what it was about, you know, but I'll go into

a little bit more detail of initially we, from the fringes, you know, what we

were just watching, it is an intra Brahmin, uh, musician, uh, you know,

uh, rivalry, not rivalry.

It is a, uh, You know, a dispute between two groups within the thing.

One who, uh, are, you know, holding on to the hegemony. Those who

don't want progress. Those who don't want to share Carnatic music with

anyone. You know, who keep it away from the common man. Uh, that's

one group. And the other group, you know, whose leading voice has

been T.

M. Krishna over the years. He wants to take Carnatic music, uh, you

know, to the common masses so that everyone can enjoy. So now

coming to the history of the Music Academy, it was set up, you know, in

1927. It was part of some, uh, big, uh, uh, Congress, uh, [00:14:00]

conference. At the conference, there was some deliberations and

recommendations, and they said, we have to propagate Carnatic music.

So they set it up. It started in halls, but soon it grew into this worldwide,

uh, December festival. And they say, uh, that the December Margazhi,

Margazhi is the Tamil month of December. Margazhi festival is the

largest. Uh, cultural event in the world, you know, people come, you

know, a whole month long people come from all over the world.

And, you know, but it is, uh, I mean, revelatory to this whole issue itself

is that most of the attendees at the festival belong to one particular, uh,

class and caste. So that's how exclusive the, uh, You know, Carnatic

fraternity kept this art form to

Abhinandan: itself. It was a very like the Brahmins, Brahmins own it.

Brahmins listen to it. Brahmins say, wow, that's it. And they teach only

Aiswarya: to Brahmins and they will enjoy it. The rasikas will be

Brahmins. The sabas are run by [00:15:00] the Brahmins and the

exponents are Brahmins. Now, there are outliers. There are some, uh,

very few. Uh, non brahmins that actually, uh, breach this and go inside,

but they are not famous.

They're not big. Actually, most don't, they don't get chances to sing at

these sabahs. So we have something over the past several years. We

are having the alternate to Margazhi, you know, Margazhi and Makkali

Sait, common man's music and Margazhi. So that happens in parks and

in, you know, other sabahs, we have folk arts.

And so there's this other movement going on. So these two worlds never

blend, you know, uh, those people live in their own worlds. Yeah. And

they talk a lot about it and the, uh, you know, news media papers,

everything are owned by that cast and class. So there's a lot more noise

to hear about it. So the whole dichotomy is this for a long time, all of us,

we said, you know, I mean, it doesn't matter to us what Ranjini Gayathri

said to TM Krishna or how the music academy responded to Ranjini

Gayathri.

I mean, it's between them. How does it [00:16:00] even, impact our lives.

How does it even matter? But then, you know, it's just, uh, going on, but

the national media picked up the story. And then it's going on, frankly, to

me, it doesn't make any, uh, it doesn't make any difference. Okay. I'll tell

you one reason. I mean, one reason is because you, you will hear any,

they will say, uh, they say Carnatic music cannot be, one is it's pure,

they appeal to the purity of the Carnatic music.

So only certain, only we are able to. Uh, you know, stick to, uh, transfer

its purity from generation to generation. Another now they say it's

complex. Uh, it's a very complex, uh, system of music. So common man

can't understand, can't enjoy it. So now that is, uh, the, uh, bullshit that

we want to call out, uh, that's, that's the bullshit that TM Krishna has

been calling out all along.[00:17:00]

If something is complex, it can be learned. I mean, it's not like common

man can't

Abhinandan: learn something that is, uh, yeah. Um, actually, uh, I just,

they gave us a series of interviews, this duo, Ranjini Gayatri. And I'm

quoting what they said in one of the interviews. There is

Aiswarya: always distinction in any given society.

That's what we need. Here you call it caste. And I don't think Brahmins

are casteist. We have not tried to take music away

Abhinandan: from any community. There is always distinction in any

given society. Here you call it caste and quote, Brahmins are soft

targets. We are the most accepting and least casteist community

unquote.

So I don't know what they were making their own point.

So, so I, I mean, what is, I mean, their beef, is it, are they, um, you

know, political animals? Is it just something they've jumped into or do

they have a history of? Having political allegiance [00:18:00] or, you

know, canvassing for any party or they, no one knows they've just

suddenly, because I don't know much about them.

They're

Aiswarya: relatively young women, so relatively newer on the scene.

I've heard them on TV. I've, I've, I've watched a lot of their shows on

YouTube. It's beautiful. They sing amazingly, uh, beautiful. I'm, I'm, I'm

actually a fan of Nanjini and Gayathri. But, uh, they've, they were born

and grew up in Bombay. So they are not very well, I would think they're

not very well versed with the politics of Tamil Nadu.

Here Periyar is It is our, uh, you know, it is a big icon here. We call him

the grand old man of Erode and all the progress that Tamil Nadu has

made on several, you know, health indicators, economic indicators,

women's progress, we attribute almost directly to the Periyar

Abhinandan: movement, his

Aiswarya: teachings.

Manisha: You know, he's a big man.

So what do you think would have prompted this letter from the two?

Considering they're not even part of like the Tamil Nadu politics or the

ecosystem. No, but

Aiswarya: they come here. I mean, now [00:19:00] they're part of our,

uh, uh, you know, part of the Margazhi Makkal Essai, uh, part of the

December festival organized by the Music Academy.

And they are very popular now, you know, gaining in popularity. Now, T.

M. Krishna has been going hammer and tongs against this, uh,

Brahminical hegemony. Of the classical, you know, arts, music, and

dance. And he sings in praise of per, per who was very, he didn't mince

his words in his, uh, in

Abhinandan: his criticism of bism.

Yes. He was very aggressive. I mean, I mean, as was anyone, because

I mean, that's how, even that, uh, Kran slogans.

Yeah, the whole thing, you know, that, I mean, you may not agree with

everything, like even this. Now, many people who, you know, Congress

that is going to be doing a protest with, uh, up leaders in, if they are

allowed to, on the 31st of March in Ramlila Maidan, [00:20:00] the

rhetoric from the stage was put everyone in jail, nah?

Yeah. Now everyone is in jail. Rhetoric is one thing. So. Yeah, you have

to understand

Aiswarya: all what Periyar said in context. He spoke during the 20s and

30s. It was a different language of that period. It was much accepted,

you know, a lot of Brahmins were part of the Periyar movement also.

Right, absolutely, sure.

He was not anti Brahmin. He was basically anti superstition. He was

more a rational thinker.

Abhinandan: No, also, Dr. Rao, I mean, I personally think that you have

to see things in context. Even if he was anti Brahmin, In the India he

grew up in, I don't grudge him that, you know, it's like Malcolm X. Yeah,

sure. He was pro civil liberties, but I would say he was anti white.

I mean, some of his, like there was a very marked difference in Malcolm

X's, you know, approach to civil liberties and Martin Luther King. Now I

think Martin Luther King would be more effective, but, but, uh, you know,

it's okay for like, uh, Subhash Chandra Bose [00:21:00] saying we'll go to

war against the British. Bapu wasn't anti British.

He was anti colonialism, but I don't grudge, uh, you know, the, the, the

freedom fighters who wanted a more radical approach. So I don't think

there's even anything wrong with being anti brahmin at a time when

brahminism is you see the numbers here. I mean, when they Swallowed

up all the resources in the country.

Yes. And you're the smallest community. Mm-Hmm. . It is. And

Aiswarya: gatekeeping. No complete gatekeeping education. All

opportunities. All government positions? No music. Music actually, which

evolved from, uh, another, uh, even Kna music and dance. I mean,

classical Ana is not the 40 of the Brahmins. It was part of the hereditary

cortisone, uh, community from, and they were de notified.

They were banned from. You know, uh, because of a lot of social

change, that's another story. Uh, but, uh, you know, it was, uh, taken

over by the Brahmins and, uh, they completely made

Abhinandan: it. In that context, [00:22:00] there was also an old quote

of TM Krishna that was dragged out where he had said MS

Subbalakshmi to get more accepted in the Brahmin tradition of music,

you know, had to distance herself from.

The legacy of where she got the music, which was the courtesan

tradition. Is that something on the along the lines? What was it? He is a

Aiswarya: previously from the courtesan, the formerly Devadasi, uh,

tradition.

Abhinandan: Okay. Yes.

Manisha: Her son wrote in the Hindu, I think. He

Aiswarya: defended TM Krishna's stance. And he said that if Emma

Summer was alive today, she would engage in a, you know, very healthy

discussion

Manisha: on this.

Also, I don't find TM Krishna particularly radical in his utterances. It's, it's

very inclusive. He talks about, you know, like coming up with one song a

day or a month on Allah and Jesus. Including LGBTQI Dalits. But he's

not, he's very opposed to the Sangh Parivar, but I don't think he's as

[00:23:00] radical in his utterances as, say, a Periyar.

He's not

Abhinandan: so No, no, not at all. I think what's happening right now is

that I've seen this It's a question of, you know, the tail wagging the dog,

social media trends determine what it takes up. For example, there are

people on Twitter who today want to see Periyar as a villain because of

his utterance. At that time, and anyone who today praises Periyar for

Manisha: doesn't outrightly say

Abhinandan: that he was bad, racist.

You know, you want to say Periyar was casteist. In fact, so political

parties are kind of trying to push that, that Periyar should be apologetic

for what he said rather than, you know, the entire Brahmin tradition

being feeling guilty. I mean, there has to be a Periyar guilt as opposed to

the Brahmin guilt, you know, it's just, they reversed it.

Now a dozen nutters on Twitter will say this. Those nutters are usually,

you know, people who are, a couple of them are former employees of

some rather large news organizations I have noticed. Yes. Yes. We

know. [00:24:00] Suddenly they, that becomes the, that becomes the

legacy media. Like it's such a completely idiotic narrative or even

something, you know, in any rational discussion, if you go

Aiswarya: to social media, all the idiots

Abhinandan: have found each other.

Yeah. And because idiots it's real. I mean, I think Kunal Kamra is that

one statement, key expletives coming up key big boss. Have you ever

wondered key? Do you understand in the Dr. Yes, I do. Yeah. Okay. So

Have you ever thought that Why do they

Raman: bring assholes

Abhinandan: from every corner of India to Bigg Boss?

Raman: Just

Abhinandan: like Salman Khan looks normal He says, and it's true, he

says stand up comics are afraid of making jokes at Salman Khan

Because Salman Khan, you know, he's basically a goon, a tootcha goon

And Bombay, basically, stand up comedy is Other than a few exceptions

like Varun Grover, uh, Kunal Kamran.

It's a, I mean, it's a very cowardly profession. They will not do [00:25:00]

any political comedy because it may hit them. Yeah. So they would be

scared of cracking Salman jokes.

Then Modi ji came and said, Salman Khan's ass is broken. Why should

we be scared of these people? If he drinks and calls us at night, then

we'll also have a few drinks and wake up. What's the problem? Everyone

is scared

Raman: of Salman Khan. Don't make fun of him. Oh, the girls are calling

me.

Abhinandan: So I think social media is such a nutter kind of that they

find the nutters so that the anchors can look slightly normal. Mm-Hmm,

absolutely .

Aiswarya: So the pushback against ran ga hasn't been, [00:26:00] uh,

very high. Um, in the left liberal spaces here, because we don't want to,

you know, make them, uh, give them more, uh, platform, you know, to,

to come up with this, you know, idiocy.

So it's, it's dying down here. Actually, I would say

Abhinandan: as an issue, it's more or less over. You think it will not spill

into elections and become this

Aiswarya: because I don't think so. Absolutely not. We have far more

important things to worry about. I

Abhinandan: should hope so, but I must say that Ranjani Gayatri. And

Vivek Agnihotri have one thing in common.

They both think that Brahmins have been persecuted in our country.

That is something they have in common. So I really like a lot of, uh,

Aiswarya: yeah. White Brahmin men think, so now it's, uh, you know,

the white Brahmin woman are thinking

Manisha: that now.

Abhinandan: So have you any comments on this before we say, I

Raman: haven't, uh, in fact, I once, uh, two, three years ago, I came

across his [00:27:00] article, TM Krishna, I think either in TOI or in N

express.

I think he had written about Ram and I was very impressed. And then I

referred him for the interview with you. Right. So you interviewed TM you

did. No, it's a few years. Yes. Yes. So,

Abhinandan: so, so I read his article. I think I, did I end up interviewing

him or was it a podcast? I'll just check. I think what

Manisha: Aishwarya is saying about taking classical music to the

masses, you, you really have to be against the arts to see anything

against this project.

I mean, taking it to the masses, including people, you have to have that

so that you make sure the art doesn't die. Yeah. So I, I just cannot see

the opposition to what he's doing here, especially, like I said, 'cause I

really don't find him radical in, in his views. I think it's, he's mostly talking

more inclusion.

That's it. Which, that's it. Which should not be contentious. You and me

in 2023 in the braman circles,

Aiswarya: it's very explosive and uh, uh. Uh, you know, crazy and I'll, I'll

just [00:28:00] wanted to add to this, you know, what is important for me.

I just want to add, see, I'm a Christian and I'm a Dalit. So for me, and

because I produced Carnatic music albums, no, I was completely, but

this is not in Modi's India.

I did this about 10 years back. So there was a lot of criticism. Because

we did a Bharatanatyam dance for one of the songs music video and the

women didn't wear botus for this. Like how can your Bharatanatyam

dances not

Manisha: have botu? What is botu? So there was one.

Aiswarya: What is botu? Binti. Okay. Okay. I see. So there was this

thing.

So basically they want to say Music is ours. No one else should enjoy it.

And if you enjoy it, I mean, they will, uh, cast wild aspersions on you. In

my case, they said conversion, you know, this is just

Abhinandan: one more attempt. So you were trying to convert people

through that?

Manisha: Through Bharatanatyam.[00:29:00]

Abhinandan: It's a bit like the Oxford debate. So before the debate

starts, say, okay, how many of you agree with the proposition? Everyone

puts up their hands. So before the performance, pull up your, how many

of you are Christian? So then after the performance, how many of you

are Christian? Then you see if it's gone up, the numbers gone up or

come down.

But sir, Jayashree did that interview with TM Krishna. But yeah,

interesting to note, but I do hope more important issues dominate prime

time, but this was something that I was very curious about. So I thought

we must get. Someone who understands these things to explain it to us.

But thank you so much for taking the time, Dr.

Rao, and thank you for the work you do. Thank you. Thank

Aiswarya: you. And I, uh, I'm a big fan of news laundry and you people,

uh, your podcast is very, very, uh, you know, thought provoking.

Abhinandan: Thank you. Thank you. Any recommendations you have.

For our audience that they can read, they can watch, they can listen to

that would enrich their lives in any way.

Aiswarya: Yes, I have three recommendations, but they're all one.

Okay. I'm a big sucker for a police drama, crime, thrillers, et cetera. Who

done it? [00:30:00] So, uh, on, on prime, there are three, uh, women

police dramas. Have you all seen happy Valley? Uh, it is a three season

police drama. It is about a woman police officer and she goes about, In

Yorkshire, it's a small sleepy town in, uh, nestled somewhere in the

middle of, uh, the UK where there's crime, there's drugs, et cetera.

So it's a crazy, it's a wickedly funny, it's a beautiful show. It's really nice.

Happy Valley. Is a must see do not miss it. Okay. Wonderful. Um, and

other two more police, uh, women police, uh, drama series on prime as

well. Blue lights. It's set in Ireland and there's deadlock. It's set in

Australia. So three different, uh, women led police dramas.

Awesome. You must not miss

Abhinandan: it. Okay, great. Thank you so much. And thank you for

your time and hope to see you sometime. If you're in Delhi, do come to

our studio. Yes. Thank you. Bye. Have a great day. Thank you.

[00:31:00] On that note, I would like to remind everybody again, do

subscribe to newslaundry. com, contribute, pay to keep news free.

We have a joint News Minute News Laundry subscription. I would hope

you guys would double the utility, double the support and do support

journalists because journalists need more support than opposition

leaders these days. . So, and we don't want journalists also to be going

to the same people buying electoral bonds who are also advertising

something should be left to the public.

So Rama Manisha, so many things have happened. So we let Manisha

decide what we should discuss because Va Gandhi's been dropped and

Ji has got his ticket. But Manka Gandhi has retained MS Ur. Yeah. Um,

Al of course, uh, RA and uh, Mani. Monday, you know, so much is

happening, the ticket distribution, so much is happening, you know, all

over the country.

But in Delhi streets, [00:32:00] I was just, you know, observing that when

they said we'll get out of the prime minister's house, as to the prime

minister's house, these days looks like it's never looked in my lifetime. It

is like, I've, I've stayed quite close to the Prime Minister's house, so I

pass it quite regularly.

I'm always blown away by the amount of, they've increased the security

there. Uh, and they said, we'll get out of the Prime Minister's house. The

police, matlab, they did not let them reach anywhere close. And I was

thinking, there was a time, every third, fourth month, I've had to get out

of PM Manmohan Singh's house.

And kitna hum bichare ko gali dete the. He was right. History will judge

me kindly. Of course. I think at that time he did, he was just saying it, he

was being flattering to himself. He could not have predicted Modil b this

level. I I don't think he could have predicted that mod this to India. But

now when you look back, sure.

I think history will judge him a lot more kindly than the current, than, than

than that environment. So what do you wanna discuss, man? I think the

rest of war.

Manisha: I [00:33:00] think that is the biggest news of the week. And I

don't know how much prominence it's got in television news, but at the

heart of it. This PMLA act, it's very scary what it is able to do in this case,

especially with the tweak.

So if you look at this case, essentially, what is the central allegation

against ARP that, uh, you know, wholesalers were given their profit

margins were increased from 5 percent to 12 percent and the 7 percent

margin was given to big businesses, which then gave kickbacks to ARP.

Classic case of quid pro quo, except in this case, what's astonishing is

that There is no proof.

There's no money trail that connects Arvind Kejriwal to any of these

allegations. Or even Manish. Even, okay, so, okay, at least in Manish

and Vijay Nair's case, the ED claims that his secretary has said that, you

know, he introduced a policy. Vijay Nair was a conduit between the

South group. This is all people saying, you know, approvers, basically

[00:34:00] secretaries, former secretaries saying that, you know, this is

what happened.

Nothing links Arvind Kejriwal to even Manish Sasodhia. No one has said

on record that Arvind, we heard Arvind say this to Manish and then he

introduced the policy or we have a WhatsApp message that Arvind said,

okay, Kavita should be given 1 billion. Basically they can

Abhinandan: arrest anyone or anything. And there's no

Manisha: money trail, like there's not, okay, firstly, anyway, the 7

percent is supposed to have been spent in Goa.

So we don't know what happened, where that money came from.

There's absolutely no money trail. And the scary bit is that this PMLA,

you know, it basically puts the onus on up now to prove itself innocent

and you cannot give bail in PMLA till the court is satisfied that they have

not this prima facie no, uh, case against them.

No court will ever say that which court will ever commit to saying that

there's no trial has been done. So you can basically put anyone in jail

forever. And there's no recourse. And this is very scary. I think, I mean,

[00:35:00] you have to leave aside ARP, whether you like them or not.

What do you think of this liquor policy?

This is very scary for anyone, anyone in this country. There's

Raman: one ARP minister who is already in the jail for the past three

years, I think, Satyendra.

Abhinandan: Satyendra Jain. I mean, they've sent him back and he had

come out from it. He was also, I mean,

Raman: PMLA was slapped on him. And he's inside the jail. He's not

getting bail for that.

Manisha: And in case of Manisha Sodia's bails, not as the courts have

kind of questioned the ED again and again on what proof do you have?

How can you link? Will this stand in court? But they don't give bail. But

they can't commit because no court will ever commit to saying that no

wrongdoing has happened till they have it on proof.

I mean, that goes against basic principles of, you know, No, it's a catch

Abhinandan: 22. No bail hasn't happened. So they cannot commit and

until they commit, they cannot give bail. So it's,

Raman: I don't know how the, how the courts. Should take the PMLA.

I'm in legal position on the PMP MLA. But if you look at the Uh, you

know, entire case government makes policies and these policies may

[00:36:00] go wrong, but they whether they are criminal in nature.

This is first. This is the first time. This is the first step that where you

need to identify whether these, whether, uh, you know, Yeah. What is

the criminal nature of this police policy? I mean, for example, uh, Modi

introduced, uh, what is that? Uh, de demonetization. Demonetization. He

said, uh, black mangi, black money.

Abhinandan: And there was a pi also, which rejected. In fact, that is

something that even the cases that come against us, you know, on it,

this, that often, I tell the lawyers, why can't we go against the

government? At what kind of a case is this here? Mm-Hmm, . What,

what kind of a rule is this that you can question me on stuff?

They said, that's a policy issue. That is the policy of how the income tax

act is this thing and the court will never step in on policy. This is a policy

issue. How can the court step in and decide whether you're guilty or not?

Like now with the electoral bond data out, every policy I can say,

[00:37:00] technically there is no criminality in it, but every rule that has

been changed for anything from, uh, you know, mining, uh, environment

clearances.

To Zu, right? The pharma company den. Every policy of the government

is a roco. They should be in jail. You know? It is bizarre.

Manisha: And so you can arrest any chief minister opposition leader

under PMLA. They go to jail and then they have to resign. There

Raman: is a very clear trend. Anybody who is not in BJP is facing the

legal action, the criminal action and the those who were raided and who

had criminal charges against them and they have joined BJP.

The cases have gone

Manisha: and express investigations and 95 percent were all opposition

leaders.

Abhinandan: There's so many arrests, so many injustices that are

happening in the country. This clearly, I personally think that the Modi

government underestimated the kind of, [00:38:00] uh, you know, appeal

that Arvind Kejriwal still has.

For example, the German diplomatic office issued a statement, they

were summoned by the M. E. A. I was impressed. The U. S. U. S. U. S.

is, you know, Gloria was summoned by them saying that, what, what

was the exact there? Internal matter. This thing was unwarranted as

Persians. Abhay, as Persians, of course, the world will make you, they're

running this like Putin's Russia.

Yeah. I mean, of course you can't say, oh, no one should say anything to

me because, oh, we are so great. We are mother of democracy, but

demonstrate it. You're running it like Putin's Russia. No, that's how

you're running India right now. So the question is the snowball effect.

And I think they had underestimated the snowball effect in the March

31st.

Uddhav is coming to Delhi. Congress is part of it. Unless they turn Delhi

into a fortress, which they're doing now, I just like to point out. How the

media was roughed up by the cops for trying to cover this. And in fact, I

don't know how many of them have written articles on this, but I have

[00:39:00] spoken to reporters who were trying to get to the ARP

headquarter.

They could not get to the ARP headquarter. Some who managed

somehow, it was empty. And I've spoken to three reporters who told me

this. And the police saying, we are not, we have not cordoned off the

ARP headquarter. So, I mean, if you run a country like this, you can't

expect the world to clap and say, Oh, look at these wonderful people

who stand up for liberty.

I mean, it is bizarre, but what is sad is even the fourth pillar of

democracy, media, they are not standing up for their own reporters.

Manisha: Yeah. So the Hindustan photojournalist has fractured his arm.

The guy, the viral picture that's, you know, with the cop holding the neck

is an India Today photojournalist.

Now, I'm very sure if this was West Bengal or if this was, you know. Any

of the Congress states Sudhir would have done a prime time show, yeh

dekho kaise hain. No one has said anything. No one. This guy, you can

see the cop holding his neck is an India Today guy. And, but the big

question I think also is to really, this will be very interesting elections

because 2019 [00:40:00] Lok Sabha, BJP sweeps and gets 56 percent

vote share.

The next year, ARP sweeps state elections and gets 53 percent vote

share. So clearly there's an overlap. We know that, uh, you know, the

Delhi voter likes BJP in center and ARP at state. What are they going to

do this time? And how will, will parties be able to mobilize voters to see

through this very dangerous trend?

Because I do think this has not gone down well with people. I do think

there's a sense among people, you know, don't, this has gone a bit too

far. He's an elected guy. He's highly popular. They've decisively won

state assembly elections to put him in jail like this is, I think also

Abhinandan: as we speak, the election commission has issued a notice

to Supriya Shanate I think to do a balancing act, but this and the national

commission of women have has taken cognizance of Supriya Shanate's

tweet, but on way more horrific stuff.

It is. It is a dis What you've done to every institution and yet you don't

want to be criticized. Right. Dude, really, this government is [00:41:00] in

a different zone of nothingness. But

Manisha: I also feel like Congress, like I feel so angry with Supriya

Srinait or her team, whatever. There's so much you can take on

Kangana with.

Why do you have to tweet something so stupid and lowly, yaar? I mean,

there's so much you can, if you wanted to counter or whatever, make fun

of her final candidature. It's pretty cross

Abhinandan: what they said. Meanwhile, Mahua Moitra has been

summoned yet again, CBI searched her house apparently. The

opposition

Raman: has any, I mean, Modi government has a mounted, you know,

attack on the opposition there.

The bank, I think they, they're going to slap another income tax notice

on, uh, not notice they go. Uh, you know, take, uh, they have only taken

Manisha: out one 30, a 35 Corona from Congress saying the income

tax,

Raman: and they're going to take some more

Manisha: now. But it's really tragic that the media is not, I mean, media,

by we mean the popular, most loudest voices because this is, this is on

the day arrested is

Raman: student level stuff.

No, on the [00:42:00] day Casey was, was arrested, there was. Uh, you

know, coverage, coverage, there was a proper

Abhinandan: coverage,

Manisha: coverage is like, you know, if you are not guilty, what is the

fear, prove it and come out, but the provisions are very scary. No one

can, no one can prove themselves innocent with these provisions,

anyone's is going to rot in jail with these provisions, there's just no

fighting it.

Actually,

Abhinandan: the thing is that although either there should be equal

opportunity, it should not just be the ED that should be allowed to prove.

Try people under PMLA. Give it to any CID police. Then you see every

political leader will be in jail. No, if you, I had said

Raman: it in the past also, if you just look at the investigate,

investigating, you know, agencies in India, CBI always used to take the

Case first, the case used to come to CBI, so after CBI, they will, or it,

they will hand it over.

They will just ad will examine [00:43:00] the, uh, you know, clauses and

everything and see if there is a case of PMLA or money laundering,

money laundering case hack in, I mean, they, they, they used to file a

case after CBI files the charge sheet. But now the trend is. Uh, opposite

because ed, uh, you know, the provisions of this PML and all, they're so

draconian that you cannot get bail.

So the CBI has been relegated into the background and ed has become

the prime investigating agency. And if you look at their, uh, also record,

the success record is not even 1 percent

Abhinandan: right now. Now, some. Crystal ball gazing. I know that is

not what we usually do here, but sometimes we like to. Do you think, or

in your analysis, sitting in the air conditioned studios of News Laundry,

bloody air conditioned,

Manisha: what do you know?

Soon we'll be hitting the road, though, in heatwave, peak heatwave

Abhinandan: in May. You can, Manisha. I shall still be sitting in air

conditioned studios. Uh, but Do you [00:44:00] think this has, it's going to

be, play positively for the BJP or it's gone backfired? It's boomeranged

on them. What do you think, Manisha?

Manisha: I don't think it's played positively at all, but I do think that for an

electoral outcome, you need political mobilization.

So much will depend on how our Congress, India Alliance and other

parties can come together and really make this into an issue, rally

people around it, protest, go out and really kind of milk this. But I don't

think fundamentally. People are okay with it because he's a popularly

elected leader.

Raman: If you, if you make cage reward today, the referendum point, it's

with this issue is going to hit the opposition, uh, Modi government like

hell.

But having said that the opposition parties would not like to see Rahul

Gandhi would not like to see cage reward growing above his stature or

Mamata above her stature. So maybe they will not go to that point.

[00:45:00] So I think. Uh, the impact is not going to be much, uh, political

impact, I mean, especially the coming election.

Uh, I'll be, I will really be surprised if, uh, the opposition is able to one,

when, uh, you know, I mean, up is able to win two, even one or two

seats, one or two seats from Delhi,

Manisha: India, because now they're on Delhi. In Delhi. No, no, India

Alliance. India Alliance, whatever. And in one year, there's the state

elections.

Don't forget, like Delhi Assembly used to vote. So you crippled an

Abhinandan: entire party. But by Assembly, I think what they'll try to

also do is, President's rule or some shit, they'll come up with it. But I

think that I was very surprised, and this is purely anecdotal, the people I

know. I have a few relatives who Modi supporters.

After this arrest, they said, yeah, this is ridiculous. We are not voting for

this guy. This guy is just, he was, cause you know, I was very surprised.

Then I asked, you know, some people around in my colonies, you know,

what do you [00:46:00] think? You know, people are not particularly, you

know, anti Modi. They were, they were saying, yeah, he's good for them.

This has actually put off a lot of his voters because for also like, but it

has, the reverse is not true. It has not. The people are cheering. They

would vote for Modi, whether he did demoralization, whether he told

them to stand and Ali Baja or whatever, they would vote for him. It is that

one in the middle that decides the votes also.

Yeah. Who has said that, dude, this guy will do anything tomorrow. We

are also in shit. So I think that that

Manisha: is the only thing I do feel is that, you know, people, I think a lot

of people recognize these dictatorial tendencies and they recognize

what's happening with opposition Chief ministers. But somehow the, the

cluelessness of Rahul Gandhi is scarier to people than the autocracy of

Modi.

Like in a lot of conversations, people know that he is going to do a

dictatorship. But then the moment you put Rahul in front of them, I think

just having a clueless [00:47:00] person is scarier than having a,

dictatorial person. And this is born out in a Pew research. Hilal Ahmed

has done a very good piece in the print where he says that, uh, most

Indians want representative democracy.

Uh, they're very happy with representation within electoral democracy in

the sense more women, more people from marginalized, but they have a

liking for a strong leader who can get things done. There is that space. I

think we are at that point. point in India where there's an appreciation, I

guess, because we are fed up of chaos and not just in India, the world

over me.

No, I

Abhinandan: think

Raman: so. My

Manisha: experience is that is what is helping Modi, Rahul as a

Raman: face, even in Bollywood movies, if you see animal or for that

matter, any other movie where the, if the hero is strong, stronger, and

even if he's dictator, uh, I mean, uh, he is draconian in his behavior.

Yeah. People like. People like. So I think people see a stronger po

strong [00:48:00] person, uh, in, uh, Modi rather than a dictator.

Dictator.

Abhinandan: He, no,

Manisha: but I think the , which is why I think is a scarier, uh,

proposition for the bjp because people don't, people don't see him as

with the election

Abhinandan: results. You see, I think that is clear that for the BJP they

see KDY as the biggest danger to them, which is why for someone who

was so small, ah, yeah, they came and they changed a few rules as

soon as they got their first term.

Taking the a, CB out of K Gal's control in Delhi and the way they went

after him from day one. Day one, it was clear and many people who

have been close to BJ P will tell you, Mr. Modi, they changed the

Raman: rules, they changed the administrative rules, rules of Ali after

Supreme Court, uh, you know, gave a decision in his

Abhinandan: favor.

So they clearly realize that K GAL is the bigger danger to mohi than

anything else. But the same pure research, I dunno if it's the same one

you're talking about. It also said that, uh, you know, Indians have a liking

for military rule autocrats and yes, you know, that the, it's a, and it's

[00:49:00] gone up in the last five years, you know, from the last time

this research was done to now.

The number hasn't gone down. The number who prefer autocracy has

gone

Manisha: up. Clear, decisive leader who's not, yeah, who's not bogged

down by, say,

Abhinandan: coalition or parliament. By rules and, you know, these

inconvenient things like constitution. But I think that if

Manisha: you had an opposition face which was a little more coherent

than what Congress is putting up.

Modi could get a very good

Abhinandan: fight. I mean, honestly, I think if you had a level playing

field, Mr. Modi would have not been this large life image, dude. You

have the ed, CBI, the so many, so many people want to go and join, but

they're scared to go. They don't wanna go to jail. Yeah. I'm telling you, I

myself, and it's not like I'm scared of going to jail.

But this is going to incriminate trying to go to jail. I mean, if you go to jail

for a bigger, for trying to get out of the PM's house, I've get out one

month since I was two, three times, you know, we were picked up today

that they'll slap terrorism charges against. Yes. So this, I mean, what I

actually don't agree with is that if there was a [00:50:00] credible face of

the opposition, Modi would not be, there is no credibility opposition

because he has Basically completely taken away resources, which the

electoral bond tells us the fourth, the media has been bought at a level

where people even who want to show the others are too scared to show.

Agencies have been brought over. There's intimidation at, of the most

shocking level that's happening with agencies. If you take all this away,

Mr. Modi is, he's no Marlon Brando or Amitabh Bachchan, dude. But I

think Rahul, you give You give an auditorium full of people, 30 minutes

of Modi and 30 minutes of Kejriwal.

I can tell you, Kejriwal will make Mr. Modi look like a complete, but will

anyone give that? So it's not that, no, why focus on Rahul? They can

have so many, again, who the hell was Kejriwal in 2010? Yeah, he was

nothing. 3000 people had gathered right now. Whatever, 10, 000 people

have gathered in Ladakh. Has anyone gone live?

We've done a couple of stories. Less than one [00:51:00] third of those

people had live wall to wall coverage here in Jantar Mantar. I can tell you

because I used to be calling up reporters and asking them to cover it.

You give the same exposure, Mr. Modi will not last a year. Right.

Manisha: I think Rahul Gandhi, even if he gets the media exposure, it's,

I don't think he's just a media problem.

No, no, I'm talking about Rahul because I think people see Rahul as the

other

Abhinandan: alternative. No, no, no. That is because, that is because

Modi says, Modi says

Manisha: Rahul Rahul. with the same resources that Modi has, regional

leaders have taken him on and beat him in hollow. Because there's

leadership, there's strategy, there's work on ground, there's cadre,

there's There's something to these leaders, which a Congress doesn't

have.

I think like the current Congress cannot take

Abhinandan: on Modi. But to discredit Modi, you don't need Rahul. It

could be anyone. But right now we don't

Manisha: have. They are presenting us only as Rahul as an option.

They are.

Abhinandan: BJP. Even the Congress. Even the Congress do it. But

what I'm saying is that that doesn't matter. If you give a level playing,

now what I'm saying is, why should they decide who you put against

who?

Let the [00:52:00] level playing field decide who they put against, you

know like the, that, that WWF that used to happen. 30 people in the ring,

now the last two surviving will figure it out. Let it go like that. And why

should we have Rahul versus Modi? I reject that. Whole thing. Because

that's what

Manisha: they're giving us.

Who is they? The Congress party. They are not protecting anyone else.

But why do you have to listen to the Congress party? But as a voter, I'm

talking as an Indian voter, when you go out to vote, you're choosing a

central figure, your prime minister. There is the India Alliance, which

doesn't have the prime minister thing.

And there's very clearly Congress. Projects Rahul. All said and done,

Rahul is their leader. No,

Abhinandan: no, no. There's no one else. Maybe Congress's leader.

No, what I'm saying is. So why will

Manisha: I, so for me, I'll go for Modi because he's just, there's a

coherence to his politics. What

Abhinandan: I'm saying is that when you have decided that the

Congress and BJP are deciding for you who the leaders should be, had

anyone decided Manmohan Singh will be, or H.

G. Devgad will be, or I. K. Gujral will be. What I'm saying is that, This

entire framing of Modi versus Rahul is the success of the BJP's media

machine. It is [00:53:00] a completely made up. It is absolutely one other

election in, and I can tell you, so has covered more than me. I have seen

five, seven, uh, Lok Sabha elections.

I have not even seen one election. It was not Atal versus Manmohan

before Atal became, it was not Atal versus Sonia. It was Sonia

Manisha: versus Atal. Sonia was pretty much the face of UPA 1. She

got them to win, but with a great machinery also.

Abhinandan: Hang on, hang on. UPA 1 was not Sonia versus Atal.

Sonia was no one before UPA 1 happened, dude.

You are forgetting.

Manisha: No, but there was this whole thing of where she was going to

be the prime minister and then Sushma

Abhinandan: Sohra and all. Yeah, that is because they had got the

numbers.

Manisha: Okay. But she was pretty much the person on rallies. No, no,

Abhinandan: they were not even expecting to get. I am talking about, I

don't know if you recall, They had no idea they would win.

Ah. I remember Montek Singhaluvalia who was with World Bank, that

night he was called by, Panmohan Singh, please come back to India. He

came next week, he resigned his job. The UP and [00:54:00] I can tell

you, friends of mine were part of that. They had no clue they were

winning that. No clue. But forget that. I am talking about the run up to

that election.

Was it Sonia versus Atal? Are you kidding?

Manisha: Sonia was pretty much a prominent face in that campaign and

there was a coherent Congress leadership. No, there wasn't. I don't think

the UPA one can be compared to the Congress of today. I do think

Abhinandan: there were, I'm not comparing again. I'm talking about,

again, we are going into a different, UPA one is a post election

phenomena.

I'm not comparing UPA one today's Congress. UPA one was post

election phenomena. There was no UPA that contested the election. The

election was contested by Congress. And I can tell you, I was very much

writing on that. I was writing regularly for NDTV, the political satire show.

Sonia was nothing. Sonia became this political entity after election.

Dude, Sitaram Kesari had pushed her out of Congress, what are you

talking about? She had self involved But UPM, and

Manisha: I've read so many of these politi Like, Neerja Choudhury's

book also talks about her campaigning, how she was the face, she

[00:55:00] really took them on. Like, the The U. P. Congress itself like

projected her as the whole Gandhi.

They

Abhinandan: gave her credit for everything. No, they gave her credit

later on, but her entire political, she really earned her chops as a political

strategist till election. Tina, where did the concept of there is no

alternative emerged from? It emerged from the 2004 election. There is

no alternative. If not at all, who?

That is the genesis of this question. Mr. Modi has not invented this

question. And then I've, I've told us on half the promote Mahajan used to

threaten reporters like this here in front of them. Dude, we are coming

back. He was so confident. Sonia Gandhi's entire stature and oh, she's

so big and everyone's scared of her was a completely post election

phenomena.

Before that, no one was scared of Sonia Gandhi. She was not such a big

deal in politics. The way Sita Ram Kesri humiliated her. What are you

talking about? She had to leave the Congress office and you know, in

tears, go to a house [00:56:00] on foot. Yeah. She was nothing.

Manisha: Yeah, I don't know. But you pay one like what I've read from a

lot of political commentators of that time She was supposed to be like

one of the big Election campaigners for the Congress the big she

Abhinandan: was nobody for the rest of the public See once you win,

everybody's great.

I love

Manisha: you pay one. Would you describe Congress's win during you

pay one to Sonia? No, you

Abhinandan: would know you pay one was a Coalition of a

Manisha: 27 party. Yeah, but I'm saying Congress is

Raman: Rahul Gandhi was surprised to, uh, win 21 seats from UP. He

was

Abhinandan: very surprised that UPA too, I would say was phenomenal

because of Manmohan.

There were a variety of reasons. The

Manisha: Farm Loan Waiver basically, that is what it was. It

Abhinandan: was a big deal, dude. Okay. All

Manisha: said and done, but I still think that Congress is not providing

an alternative to Modi. And it is a contest of national parties right now.

And there's no other national party to the BJP. I think Congress has a

clueless leadership here.

They're not inspiring.

Abhinandan: There are, but again, see, there are two things. And even

if you give it to the

Manisha: media,

Abhinandan: I don't think you can say this is a [00:57:00] phone. And

this is a piece of paper. This is a piece of paper because this is a phone.

Again, you are saying Congress has a clueless leadership as if I'm

opposing that.

I'm not pushing back on that. I agree with you. I'm disagreeing on the

following. That means Modi is the only alternative. That is what I'm

disagreeing with.

Manisha: I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that current, uh, sort of

choices in front of the voter for the election is a Congress, Rahul Gandhi

and a Modi.

And

Abhinandan: I am saying that is. It's purely because of the way the

media has framed it. I am saying you are taking something as a given.

As if it is a natural answer, that's the axiom. It is not a given that is

something that has been framed. This is not red because it was bonded.

We chose it to be red. If the designers of the studio had said this is not

going to be, it wouldn't be red.

It could be any color, the media, the agencies, and the corporations

country have decided to pitch it. Modi versus Rahul. Otherwise. Let

chaos prevail and see who emerges. [00:58:00] Yeah, it's, it's not, I

mean, it's not a, you take them, forget the other agents, take media

away. See how long Modi's invincibility

Raman: stays. It helps Modi to project Rahul Gandhi.

It helps him. It helps the BJP.

Manisha: Not just Rahul Gandhi. Not like Congress is saying we

Abhinandan: have something else. Sir, people's credibility, people's

credibility doesn't fall because there is someone to make it fall. If you let

people criticize Modi the way they want to. In mainstream media, his

stature will fall.

Rahul doesn't have to rise. How many like Modi's latest speech and what

was this, um, uh, summit where he's India will be the world load bearing,

whatever, complete nonsensical stuff. You let people make montage of

that and run it on prime time. See what credibility he has left. Cloud se

humne yeh kar diya.

Maine 1970 80 mein email pe bhej diya. Up what, what I'm saying is that

is, but these, these runners montages on legacy media, let them run as

[00:59:00] montage on legacy media Mohi. See in four years how much

credibility has

Manisha: it? I think media is a big factor in their arsenal of why they win,

but I don't think it's the only one.

I do think like absolutely there's a lot more to what the BGP is doing and

yeah, I mean I do think all these regional Mata, Riva, , all these guys

with the same conditions have been able to give Mohi a very good

Tucker. Precisely because they know politics and Congress is failing in

politics.

Abhinandan: Anyway, on that note, we shall take the emails of the

week.

You can give us your feedback or suggestions or recommendations,

your critique, your criticism, but we only entertain the criticism and

feedback of our subscribers. So unless you're a paying subscriber. We

will not really include your email or your feedback. So mail us at

podcasts at newslondon. com. I repeat podcasts at newslondon.

com or click on the link, which opens up this little form and you can give

us your feedback directly. That is a more efficient way of doing it. So, uh,

Here is what we have [01:00:00] from the last few. So, Manisha, you

haven't been here for a while. So,

Manisha: Shweta Godavarthy says, Hi, dear NL. Congratulations.

Project electoral bond.

Congratulations, NL and project electoral bond team. I've been following

NL's reporting on political funding since your piece 2024. And the stories

have educated me of the extent of nexus between corporates, political

parties in power and enforcement agencies. However, I'm failing to see

any direct establishment of quid pro quo.

Is NL doing stories, investigations, examining, casual evidence of an

understanding between a corporate and a ruling party for favors in return

for money, for the time frame of disposit and encashment of EBs, or am I

missing something? Else, for the jaded public, it remains no more than

further evidence of crony capitalism, harassment by enforcement

agencies, and hamam mein sab nange hai rhetoric, which is problematic

in itself, but not enough to jolt us citizens to action.

Keep up the good work. I had the same question of you today. There's

one story that is coming up. No.

Raman: Yeah. [01:01:00] We can't say in as many words, it's good

Proco, but yes, if you look at the proximity of the dates, you know, when

the bond was bought, okay. Say it was, uh, bought say on 27th of

March, right. Today's 27th of March.

Uh, 1st of April, the BJP takes, uh, in cash. Okay. And 7th, Uh, 7th of

April, something happens, either the contract is being given or there is

some tweak in the policy matter. I mean, yeah, I think that is it. So it

needs to be further approved. What is left now is money. Money trail is

also there.

Abhinandan: Exactly. I think there is more evidence of quid pro quo

here.

But yeah, but also, you know what India has extortive bribery. One

bribery is that you give me money and I will do your work. One bribery is

unless you give me money, I'll finish you. [01:02:00]

Manisha: If you want to continue with your business, happily,

Raman: our first story, which was based on the trust, the list that's, uh,

uh, BJP had given to the election commission.

So we identified 41 such companies which were either raided, you know,

by it or, or, uh, Or, uh, GST or, uh, you know, this ED and, uh, before

they, you know, gave donation to the .

Manisha: One case that I found very shocking was this deli liquor

scams, uh, liquor policy at calling it a scam because we don't know if it

is.

Uh, but, uh, this phan Ready who gave five crow to Marta party five days

after, after he was taken custody approval, and then 25. The day after

he was turned an approver. So this is a person, an approver in a case

against the opposition party, which the BJP has. And he's given 25

crore. I think it's So you become

Raman: the approver

Manisha: or you give us the money?

Obviously as journalists we can't directly say anything. But the facts kind

of tell the [01:03:00] story.

Raman: You need to, you know, make it 2 plus 2. So the investigating

agency should, we are giving the, we are giving enough hints that there

is a prima facie case for

Abhinandan: further investigation. But that's up to the agencies.

But Swetha, to answer your question, yes, there are lots more stories

coming up based on electoral reports. Many. You will see them.

Continue over the next few

Manisha: weeks. Yes. Doctor Skeptic says in a reply to a journalist

asking about how Muslims won't be able to practice their Sharia law.

Amitha replied, Indian Muslim has not been living as per Sharia law

since British Times because the criminal code was always uniform.

If Sharia has applied, then thieves will have their hands cut. Rapists will

be stoned to death. Muslims. Can't take loans, can't take interest. To

which prominent Muslim handles on X replied that they do indeed want

Sharia criminal code applied in India. People like Anas Tanvir, Hafta

panelist on UCC has tweeted in response to this that he'll support BJP if

they bring Sharia criminal code.

My question to the panel is how will India address this kind of religious

extremism where prominent Muslims want to? to take us back to

[01:04:00] barbaric times of hands being cut and adulterers being

Abhinandan: stoned. I mean, I can't speak for him, but I can't speak for

the gentleman who you have mentioned. I'm just going on this Twitter

timeline.

I don't know

Manisha: what he has. I think maybe he does. He means sarcastically.

Was he being sarcastic? Maybe

Abhinandan: he's being sarcastic. I don't know, but just, uh, just to give

you an idea that I, um, have spoken to, okay, here it is. Amit Shah is

asking a legitimate question. Anas Tanvir. So, Advocate on Record SC.

So, the thing is that, you know, and this is the problem with religion and

I've discussed this often and many of our co panelists have disagreed at

that time.

Uh, I don't know whether you are aware or not, uh, Dr. Skeptic, even the

Sharia law, Is interpret differently by different people. Ah, so there was

this entire debate was happening and there was someone who is quote

unquote Islamic scholar, [01:05:00] and I was very surprised when he

said that. Uh, I'm not saying Shari, I should be here, but this is a wrong

interpreter.

Shari doesn't say you have to cut off the hands. And I was like, what?

That's what is happening. Like, I'm not gonna, I don't have the time to go

read what said in this had let Dr. Zan do that, what his name is, ZI. But

the point is, I was like, dude, everybody has their own interpretation of

everything.

Manisha: Which is why you need a common criminal code.

Yeah, exactly. Because you can't have different people interpreting it

differently. Anonymous says, how do you think parties like BJP decide

on keeping the same candidate for a Lok Sabha election versus

replacing with a new one? Is there a scientific data back method for this,

which Modi Shah will use like carrying out surveys?

Yeah, all parties do carry out surveys in their constituencies on

popularity, So it is the parties individually, individually. So this would be

there would be some assessment that they do unless until also there are

money bags which are important for a party. So then, you know,

everything else takes a backseat.

Ravinder Singh says, Hi team. Love your [01:06:00] work as always.

Just wanted to let you know this week I received a notification on my

iPhone that my password for newslaundry. com has been compromised

and appeared in a data leak. Really? Not sure if this has anything to do

with the attack on your website, but this does make me worried.

Please send us details for this. Yeah, Ravindra

Abhinandan: just mail me at bhinandansekhari at gmail. com. I mean,

although there has been no attack on our data because, um, the attack

on our website is basically server just sending traffic. There's no data

that goes the other way. But, uh, if you've got such an alert ages, check

if it's actually from us, because I have got a lot of alerts.

And did you guys also get it from me only? I need money, et cetera, with

my photograph and all that. What? No. Who else got it? You got it,

Aryan? Yeah, sometime back. So there was my photograph, my

everything. Tanishka, Tanishka, I'm in trouble. Can you just send me

some money? What? Really? Sumedha also got it. So, um, yeah, but

we'll check Ravinder, mail me up in Andan

Manisha: com.

Julian says Neom [01:07:00] Chomsky expressed in 2023 that it was

misguided to convene the G20 meeting in what he described as

occupied and brutalized region of Jammu and Kashmir, raising concerns

about the moral stance of the grouping in holding such an event in a

region marked by suffering. Should India consider its pursuit of Kashmir

given the ongoing suffering of its people while the efforts yield little

practical results?

The comparison drawn between India's handling of Kashmir and Israel's

occupation suggests troubling parallel, with reports indicating a better

situation in Azad Kashmir compared to Jammu and Kashmir. I don't

know if this No, that's not true. Also, it wasn't held in Jammu and

Kashmir. Maybe like there were some MPs who went there and some

Abhinandan: groupings.

They had a tour that went there and they were saying that's anomalous.

So, During A, I disagree that the situation in Azad Kashmir is better than

Jammu and Kashmir. There is absolutely no, um, what do you call, uh,

economic activity that happened in Azad Kashmir. That's worth speaking

about. Also,

Manisha: it's Pakistan occupied Kashmir, guys, please.

Oh, that's what they

Abhinandan: call it. [01:08:00] No, but even there they have different

versions of how they call it. The, yeah, it's P. O. K. P. O. K. We call it P.

O. K. India calls it P. O. K. In Pakistan, depending on who's talking, they

can call it Azad, they can call it P. O.,

Manisha: whatever. The Kashmir in India is India, they call it

Abhinandan: India Occupied.

So, now, um, I can just tell you, A, I was in Lahore in 2006 or 2007 or

2008, I forget, for an event. It was a big event and there were a lot of

volunteers there who were doing a lot of major work and they were just

really excited and so in the evening when we were sitting and chatting, I

asked one of them, so where are you from?

Young girl, she must have been, you know, early to mid twenties. So

she, uh, said Kashmir, I said, Oh, and then I realized, of course, she

doesn't mean my Kashmir, you know, I said, Oh, okay. And then she had

this really sad smile on her face and [01:09:00] she said, this is the

biggest thing that we look forward to. Other than this, there's no event

that I can actually.

So it's a no contest. You know, I'm no fan of Mr. Modi Shaw. Forget this

government, just the way successive governments have treated Jammu

and Kashmir. It has been extremely unfortunate right from, you know,

the senior Mr. Abdullah being tossed in jail to subverting elections. in

critiquing or criticizing that I don't think anyone should be any illusion that

the other side of Kashmir economic activity is still more on the side in

spite of all the shit that's happening.

What we should be careful is that we do not become Pakistan because

religious fanatism is what took it to the where it is. But even today,

unless you were drunk on religion, like many people on both sides are

from pure economic activity from economic opportunities, would you like

to be that side of the side?

I think for any young person who's looking for a future in life, they would

want to be on this side. It's, I don't think it's even a,

Manisha: you know. Also, I don't think Palestine, [01:10:00] Israel and

the problems in Kashmir. Yeah, that's very different. Okay. Pruthul

Ravindranath. Hello. Abhinandan's glorification of US democracy is very

annoying.

US has been a democracy for 250 years now. And at least until 1960s,

there was mob lynching of minorities. Even today, there are so called

goon squads and KKK active over there. He's so bent on giving the

oldies the leniency towards their dogmatic behavior and LGBTQ plus

communities, but not to Indian democracy, which is barely a hundred

years old.

Listening to him makes it sound like it's the end of Indian democracy. I

don't deny it's a threatening state, but it's the case almost everywhere.

Russia, China, US, depending on who wins. Indians have constantly

protested injustice. Sometimes it works, 2011 protests, and sometimes it

doesn't, anti CA protests.

That doesn't mean that he uses his platform to make a generalized

statement. Also, his example of Nikki Haley was wrong. Her base did

abandon her. She lost the primaries in her own state, and not because

her policies were any different from that of Trump's. It was because

[01:11:00] Republicans warned Trump no matter what.

As an avid subscriber, my request to Abhinandan is to kindly relax his

negativity on Indian democracy and glorification of the West. Stop

glorifying the West. Kyun Trump ko bhi toh, uh, hai, more than Biden. So

we should not look up to

Abhinandan: them. Okay, see now how Manisha replaces words, look

up to everything, you know.

He's saying you're glorifying

Manisha: it. Let him

Abhinandan: say what he wants, man. I'll just, I will dig my heels in on

this Prathul. A. It is not, uh, uh, just the democracy or a charm if I quote,

uh, that this is a hundred years. This is a hundred years old. So then

because they invented the internet 20 years before us, we should come

to internet 20 years later.

Like, so we should, there are certain things that are not how old it is a

concept of democracy. Once it starts spreading in the world, it spreads

at a wave. way faster than others and values. For example, North Korea

is not a democracy. [01:12:00] Does that mean we will be okay with, let's

say they became a democracy today, that for the next 10 years, you

know, slavery should be there.

I mean, they've heard of what's happening the world over, right? So this,

they are 250 years old. I understand that that is a robust. you know,

argument for our institutions aren't that strong. But to say that 60 years,

it'll take us 250 years to get there. Then, I mean, if, if, if that is the unitary

method one applies to everything, then we will be far away on

everything.

It will be 200. And, uh, no, Haley's base did not abandon her. The

Republican party's base prefers Trump. Haley's base still stuck onto

Haley. She did not get zero votes. What I'm saying is she, Trump has

taken over the Republican party, but can Haley switch to the Democrats

today? I guess you understand what I'm saying.

Can you do a complete 180 degree, [01:13:00] a society like that?

Could, could today Corbyn become a, uh, uh, a part of the government?

There's no chance. Could Sunak say, you know what? I'll become

Labour. But here it can happen. Look at Naveen Zindal. I mean, you give

me an example of where it can happen.

Raman: This election is an election of

Abhinandan: turncoats.

So it's not like Nikki Haley abandoned her. Has she joined the

Democrats? And do you think she can? Just answer that question. And

I'm extremely optimistic. If I wasn't, I wouldn't be doing the job I'm doing.

I'm fighting every day. I got one more IT notice the day before yesterday.

While we are recording this, tomorrow is my hearing in the high court.

I would not be fighting if I didn't believe in our country. I am not one of

those who say, Oh, wonderful, wonderful. Look how shit they are. Our

institutions in our country are a different level of going down. Yeah. And

it has nothing to do with how old our democracy is. It is the mindset of

people which comes from [01:14:00] caste system.

We give in to authority like that, and that's the problem.

Manisha: Comrade Shepard says, on the discussion of the Indian

mentality, it seems Prashant Kishore is really optimistic about us Indians

and our revolutionary spirit, whereas Ravish Kumar is getting cynical day

by day like me. It would be a treat if you could get to both of them for an

interview.

Can you do a segment on anti defection laws and how they could Could

or could not apply to hostile takeovers of state governments and states.

It seems my state, Himachal, is getting ready to be taken over. And can

you explain why in Himachal, it seems like everyone has a farm land and

sustain themselves.

Whereas in Punjab, UP, Bihar, etc. It's not the case. Is that the case in

Himachal? Post Zimandari abolition, Asparis are well off compared to

other states in this matter. Why? Not sure if everyone in Himachal has. I

mean, the apple orchards, of course, are pretty, I mean, it's a belt. You

cannot buy land. It's a belt.

You can buy a house. And it's a small state also. You

Raman: can buy a flat, but you can't buy. Agricultural

Abhinandan: land. And

Manisha: that agricultural [01:15:00] land will be there, the orchards and

all. I mean,

Abhinandan: I don't know what the data says, but purely from, you

know, having traveled extensively in many of these states, he's right that

you meet people who would appear to be in the socioeconomic bracket,

See, but they would say, haan hamara ek baag hai, and I'm like, dude,

mera to sala ek apartment bhi So, you know, what I'm saying is Pahadi

people have land and you don't see poverty the day you, the way you do

in a Rajasthan or a UP or a Bihar or even a Punjab in the hills in

Uttarakhand, in Himachal.

You don't see that poverty. So I don't know whether

Manisha: they are. I think Himachal is better off though. Uttarakhand is

still quite poor. And I think it's got to do with apple farming because it's

just more lucrative. So even if you have a small scale bag with just like

six apple trees, you are able to generate an income that.

You know, you won't in others, but that's purely because of Apple, I

think, and fruit. I don't [01:16:00] think Uttarakhand is, Uttarakhand,

Garhwal areas can be very desperately poor. Really? Yeah. Even

Kumaon regions where there are ghost villages and people have left and

there's really nothing for people to do but join army or drive a taxi.

Abhinandan: All right. So if you have anything to say, you can write into

us at podcasts at newslondon. com. I repeat podcasts at newslondon.

com and support journalism and pay to keep news free. On that note,

what are the recommendations? Raman, do you want to go first? Yeah,

Raman: there are three good, uh, news, uh, uh, articles.

One video, the video is with the news laundry. Uh, and Anmol Pritam is

back in our team and Anmol Pritam did a very good video, 20 minute

long video on Jawaharlal Nehru university elections. He was, he spent

the entire night. It's worth watching. And especially the tadka in this were

three musketeers who had come from Delhi university and [01:17:00]

they said, so they have given a certificate.

It's a very interesting, uh, uh, report. So must watch. Then there was one

full page article in Hindu last week, the dream chasers, uh, who got

inducted into a war. So this is about, you know, many Muslims and many

Indian Muslims. Uh, you know, who ended up going to Russia for a job

and now they are fighting for Russia, you know, in, in this Ukraine war.

So, so I think there are, uh, even MEA had issued about 150 odd Indians

have gone to, recently have gone to Russia. So it's a story of those

people. Uh, this, uh, in this story, Hindu has met their family and, uh, you

know, have, uh, done a story on their socio, uh, uh, economic status and

why these people have, uh, had [01:18:00] gone to Russia.

And the third is a very good, uh, uh, the crime story. And I hats off to

Bengaluru police. Uh, it was an anchor in Indian express, how police

tracked a baseball cap from CCTV to key accused in Bengaluru cafe

blast. Case. Wow. It's a beautiful story. In fact, just one cap. Mm. And

they identified the, the criminal and, and the story, uh, you know, gives,

uh, uh, reconstructs the entire, uh, you know, criminal act and how the

Bangor police, you know, caught.

This guy. So, good story. Uh, in the Indian Express.

Manisha: So, um, my recommendation would be A, all the project

electoral bond stories that we've done with NewsUnit, Scroll,

Independent Journalists and ORF. I quite liked Raj Kamal Jha's speech

at the Ramnath Goenka Award. I don't know if you guys have seen it,

but you should.[01:19:00]

I was there. You were there. And Arunpuri were also there. I really liked

the pot shot, the subtle pot shots he took there. The media that is it now

bend over there. So I I thought it was a good speech So you should

watch that and of course watch nuisance if you haven't because you talk

about it. Yeah But you mentioned Kalipuri and the

Abhinandan: camera pan to them.

It was all it was all about India day conclave As opposed to the , the

contrast in the two events.

Manisha: Yeah. Star, that's what couldn't have been starco and uh,

yeah, I was in and the tradition is to read Ruskin Bond in Raun. So I

read his book The Many Joys of Living a Good long Life, which I think is

very nice.

If you're scared of old age, then you should read it 'cause it can be very

fruitful old age if you read his book. So, in fact, a lot of time, a lot of good

things to learn. So

Abhinandan: it's a, it's a good thing you reading, you know, Ruskin

Bond because. [01:20:00] So many people wrote in saying that this is

such a heavy news. A couple of weeks, electoral bond issues out,

election been announced, where's Manisha?

I hope she's working because our, you know, subscribers, Manish, are

paying, she should be working. No, I couldn't say that she is. Reading

Raskin Bond. On leave for two months. I suggest she's working on bond,

so it wasn't a lie. Oh, I'm reading Raskin Bond. It wasn't

Manisha: a lie. Please, I work throughout the year, okay?

I deserve. Now you're going to get letters. Last time also you got letters,

don't shame her for taking

Abhinandan: leave. But uh, yeah, I completely agree. No, no leave as

much as I personally believe people who don't take leave have

compromised decision making ability and people who don't get enough

sleep have compromised decision making ability and people who work

too hard have compromised decision making ability which is why we

have criticism like demonetization.

Dude, if you don't, don't work 18 hours a day, work 8, please sleep 8

Manisha: hours a day, this

Raman: [01:21:00] is your experience with our

Abhinandan: prime minister or what, he

Raman: works 26 hours in a day, not 24 hours.

Abhinandan: I've been there. Yeah. When you are young, luckily I was

never given a task where I had to take a decision, right? As production

assistants, as researchers during elections.

Our tasks were very basic. Make, get, make sure Vaghela makes it from

the entry of the gate to where your correspondent Uday Mahurkar, who's

now election information commissioner, he'll be interviewed without the

public beating him up. That was my job. So there's, it's not complicated.

So I was making sure because Vaghela just flipped at that time.

These are the kind of tasks you were given. So you could stay up two,

three nights and accomplish by the fourth day. I was not sure whether

I'm standing, whether I'm You know, we've been there, you know, now

imagine if I had to take those important decisions and I was in that

[01:22:00] condition, I would, I would do demonetization only.

Raman: No, no, in our profession, the reporters are mostly in that

condition. Yeah, our profession is such and, uh, you know, the teams

are not

Abhinandan: very big, so they should not become PMs.

Manisha: Otherwise, they will report it. I think the desk needs to be well

rested. You can't edit a copy without having slept. Yeah,

Raman: that's why we have five

Manisha: days a week or there is somebody, you can, uh, I mean, as a

corollary, you can Uh, report drunk, but you can never edit drunk.

Always be sober when you're editing. Oh, you have to. Not to say that

you should get drunk and report, but they're two different.

Abhinandan: People tell me that for IIT preparation, people drink and

study, it registers more. I'm like, I've never. I was like, I don't know

which, what, how your brain, I've, I've,

Manisha: even the old school editors, these stories about having old

monk in the office and smoking, I can't understand [01:23:00] how they

were doing it.

Like they must be geniuses.

Abhinandan: I don't see how you, how can you be

Manisha: drinking?

Raman: It used to happen during Vinod Mehta's time. Uh, you know,

having your vodka and coffee, uh, in the newsroom, but, but, uh, not,

not, uh, you know, so randomly sometimes it used to happen, but yes.

Uh, they used to, we used to romanticize it.

Abhinandan: I've heard these engineering colleges guys claim that

when they smoke up and study it registers more. I was like, I don't

understand how all this works anyway. So my recommendation for the

anymore, by the way, Manisha, no, that's it. So my recommendation for

the week is this new podcast I've discovered and I'm, I love it.

So I keep going back to it. Uh, this week they had one episode on the

curse of the world's fastest growing economy, which is the Guyana

economy, which is a country in South America, right up north. [01:24:00]

up north, uh, it, it, um, what do you call borders, Venezuela, and I think

Brazil, if I'm not wrong. So it has struck oil in 2015.

And ever since I struck oil, it's the world's fastest growing economy. Like

Exxon is there, everybody, that entire, we are abandoning fossil fuels.

And these guys also bloody, Venezuela suddenly has said, Oh, you

know, we own so much land. So they're getting, they're building their

army bases. Uh, and it's an interesting thing of, you know, that Joko, if

there's oil there, America's interested.

If there's oil here, this is what happens. It is playing out in real time. And

I think it's a fascinating story of a country and also India is not the world's

fastest growing economy. It is a rather worrying country, which I don't

know which way it's going to go. So that's not in itself enough. On that

note, I'd like to thank [01:25:00] our producer Aryan and our sound

recordist Naresh.

Uh, and thank you, Manisha and Raman sir. Thank you. And, uh, do you

think we should say bye bye with an Amma Subbalakshmi song or a Tic

Music song, uh, our audience can tell the difference. Here it goes,

Manisha: You for your subscription. You're changing the world by

[01:26:00] changing the way news is funded for the smoothest news

laundry experience. Download the news Laundry app. It is the best way

to listen to our paywall

Abhinandan: podcasts, and you'll also get access to all free news

laundry shows. Keep us ad free and subscriber funded.

Help us grow. Tell people who listen to you to pay to keep news free.

Subscribe to News Laundry. Keep journalism independent.

Newslaundry is a reader-supported, ad-free, independent news outlet based out of New Delhi. Support their journalism, here.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.