Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Philadelphia Inquirer
The Philadelphia Inquirer
National
Samantha Melamed

Grand jury finds sexual assault, abuse and cover-ups at Pennsylvania juvenile detention center

PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania grand jury investigating conditions inside Delaware County’s youth detention facility — which was emptied in March 2021 after allegations of rampant abuse were raised — has found systemic problems and a “dangerous absence of oversight” enabled violence, sexual abuse and other maltreatment.

The grand jury report, released Tuesday by the state attorney general’s office, did not recommend criminal charges for any former staff at the 66-bed Delaware County Juvenile Justice Center in Lima, citing statutes of limitations and a lack of admissible evidence.

But it proposed a series of legislative and policy safeguards including state laws requiring each county detention center to have a board of managers, and increasing transparency and accountability around abuse allegations.

“The Grand Jury found the system failed to protect these children and provide them with the tools they needed to reform and grow, instead abandoning them in a dangerous environment with little to no oversight,” Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement. Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s governor-elect, said he “will advocate for the reforms necessary to correct the system that failed these children.”

According to the 208-page report, young people who had been detained at Lima testified to having been punched, choked and slapped by staff in areas not covered by video surveillance. That amounted to half of the facility — and many of those cameras weren’t working. The system was so outdated that staff had to scour eBay for replacement parts.

The grand jury also found “pervasive” sexual misconduct, including harassment of female staff and youth, and sexual relationships between male officers and juvenile residents. One officer was convicted of statutory sexual assault as a result of a 2018 relationship with a minor female who had been detained at Lima. The grand jury accused county law enforcement of missing warning signs, including an instance in which a juvenile girl asked arresting officers to let her “do her hair and makeup first, so she could look good for her ‘Lima Daddy.’”

The Lima facility, which was down to a population of six by March 2021, was closed by order of the county’s president judge after the Delaware County public defender collected affidavits from youth and former staff describing abuses. The county has named a new director and board of managers as steps toward reopening a juvenile facility, though plans have not been solidified. The facility remains licensed by the state Department of Human Services.

County and court officials, the Delaware County DA’s office, and Pennsylvania DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Cover up culture

According to the grand jury, the attorney general’s investigators encountered resistance including county officials dodging their phone calls, whistleblowers reporting intimidation including threats of physical violence, and delays in accessing the Lima facility. When they returned with a warrant, they found bins of documents set aside for shredding. “There is, of course, no way to know whether anything material to this investigation had been taken or destroyed,” the report noted.

The grand jury found oversight failures extended beyond the juvenile center to county and court officials, as well as the state. Some former staff reported that virtually every call made to ChildLine, the state abuse-reporting hot line, was deemed unfounded.

The report described a cover-up culture, in which staff failed to report or falsified reports, such as an assault caught on video in which an officer grabbed a boy by the throat, leaving marks. According to the grand jury, no incident reports were filed; it came to light only after he was transferred and staff at the next facility asked about the bruises. The “extremely disturbing” incident resulted in only a summary conviction; the ChildLine report was marked unfounded and the staffer retained his job.

And, it said the center illegally kept minors in seclusion, or isolated in locked rooms — treatment that is supposed to be a last resort. State law requires a court order if a period of seclusion exceeds eight hours in a 48-hour period. But the grand jury found emails suggesting that officials in some cases sought the orders after the fact, in a manner “entirely contrary to state law” — and that Delaware County judges granted those requests.

In other cases, staff used informal seclusion for their own convenience, the grand jury found. One teen girl was locked in a room for three days, “covered in her own blood, feces and vomit,” according to the report.

“One detention officer even earned the nickname ‘23 and 1′ — a reference to being locked up for 23 hours and let out for one hour,” the report noted, “because he so frequently kept juveniles locked in their rooms.”

More broadly, the grand jury lamented that administrators disregarded the rights of children and “failed to respect (the) mission” of rehabilitation — creating instead a punitive “kid jail” in which the director, Mark Murray, referred to detained youth as “felons” though many had not even been adjudicated delinquent of any crime.

The building was ringed with barbed wire and covered in profane and disturbing graffiti that Murray testified was painted over once a year in advance of state inspections.

The grand jury castigated Murray for failing to adequately respond to and investigate instances of sexual misconduct — or undertake any policy review after an officer’s arrest for statutory sexual assault. Murray did not return a phone call Tuesday, and a lawyer representing him said he could not comment without fully reviewing the grand jury report.

But the report also blamed the county for insufficiently funding the facility and denying Murray’s repeated requests to raise wages and install a new surveillance system.

And it found that Department of Human Services’ oversight mechanism, limited to the rarely used tool of license revocation, set minimum standards but did nothing to incentivize better conditions.

———

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.