Fuming Glen Kamara reportedly had a "disagreement" with under pressure Rangers boss Gio van Bronckhorst following the full-time whistle against St Mirren.
It was another hugely-disappointing day for the Ibrox fans as they fell nine points behind Celtic in the Scottish Premiership title race, with James Tavernier's penalty rescuing a point for the Light Blues after a dreadful display in Paisley. It leaves Rangers well off the pace in their bid to bring the title back from Celtic Park with Scottish football now on hold for the World Cup, with Van Bronckhorst facing serious questions over his future in the Ibrox dugout.
There appears to be disharmony in the Rangers dressing room with Finland international Glen Kamara reportedly left reeling after being taken off at half-time against the Buddies. Van Bronckhorst subbed Kamara at the break, with Scott Arfield coming off the bench for the 27-year-old in Paisley. Kamara failed to remerge to watch during the second half.
The Athletic report that Kamara "was in the foyer fully dressed after being hooked at half-time and stood in the tunnel area sporting his sponsored Red Bull beanie hat". They add that "as the second half went on he was waiting in the foyer with his tracksuit on" before "watching from the tunnel".
Things appeared to boil over at the full-time whistle with the report suggesting "a disagreement occurred between both at full time". Kamara has been used sparingly by the Dutchman so far this term, having also been hampered by injury problems.
Rangers boss Van Bronckhorst was playing his cards close to his chest regarding the flashpoint at full-time, telling Sky Sports: “I had to substitute him because I think the team needed a change with Scotty and more runs from midfield in the right position. That is all I had to say about him."
Meanwhile, Kamara’s lawyer Aamer Anwar has denied any row. He said “Glen is the utmost professional and has always respected the decisions the manager makes - his position is that there was absolutely no disagreement & any attempt to say there was is based on pure speculation or falsehood.”
READ NEXT
