Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Technology
Samuel Gibbs Consumer technology editor

Garmin Forerunner 265 review: runner’s best friend gets screen upgrade

Garmin Forerunner 265 review showing the default watchface on a table.
Garmin shows OLED sports watches can do it all while still lasting a week between charges. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/the Guardian

The Forerunner 265 ushers in a new era for Garmin, bringing bright and sharp OLED screens to its class-leading running watches while keeping week-long battery life.

But the screen upgrade comes with a price hike. The Forerunner 265 costs £430 ($450/A$769), making it £80 more than its excellent LCD-equipped sibling, the Forerunner 255 Music. OLED screens have long been a feature of smartwatches, such as the Apple Watch, but this marks a departure for serious sports watches.

Other than the display upgrade and a new training tracking feature, the 265 is very similar to the 255, which is no bad thing. It comes in two sizes, is light and comfortable, stays put during vigorous exercise and is built to handle most sports, including swimming. It has both buttons and a touchscreen, similar to the more expensive Forerunner 955 and 965, and syncs via Bluetooth to an Android or iPhone app, direct via wifi or using a USB cable to a computer.

A shot of the Forerunner 255 next to the Forerunner
The difference in brightness and clarity between the LCD-based Forerunner 255 (46mm size, left) and the OLED screen of the 265 (42mm size, right) is night and day. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/the Guardian

The screen can either be activated by a gesture or button press, or kept lit all the time, shifting into to a dimmer display mode when not being actively used. It still looks like a sports watch, unlike competitors from Apple, Google and Samsung that typically feature more refined designs. But there are a range of colours to choose from and the standard rubber straps are easy to change.

Graphs, stats and metrics recorded by Garmin’s best-in-class sport tracking features look extra clear on the screen and are easily visible during a run, even in bright light. The OLED screen is easier to read than LCD versions in the dark, too, and can be dimmed or turned off at night for sleep tracking.

A composite image showing six different watch faces on the Garmin Forerunner 265S.
The watch has a range of faces that take advantage of the significantly crisper and brighter screen, with many more third-party options available, too. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/the Guardian

The other big new addition to the 265 is Garmin’s excellent training readiness feature, pulled from the firm’s top sports watches. It continuously tracks your recovery after exercise, adjusting for sleep, rest days, illness, fitness and other factors, combining lots of data into a simple prediction of how ready you are for more exercise. It will suggest how hard to run or how refreshed you are for a race, matching up with energy levels and muscle fatigue almost perfectly.

Specifications

  • Screen: 1.1 or 1.3in AMOLED

  • Case size: 42 or 46mm

  • Case thickness: 12.9mm

  • Band size: standard 18 or 22mm

  • Weight: 39 or 47g

  • Storage: 8GB

  • Water resistance: 50 metres (5ATM)

  • Sensors: GNSS (Multiband GPS, Glonass, Galileo), compass, thermometer, heart rate, pulse Ox

  • Connectivity: Bluetooth, ANT+, wifi

Week-long battery life

A series of notifications from a connected smartphone displayed on the Forerunner 265S.
Notifications from your phone are easy to read but are basic compared with what you get on watches from big tech competitors. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/the Guardian

One of the downsides of an OLED screen compared with the low-power LCD-based technology used by previous Garmins is the hit to battery life. The 265 lasts a long time for an OLED watch, managing up to seven days between charges used as a smartwatch with general health tracking and the screen on all the time. But that’s about half the life of the 255.

Battery life is very similar to its stablemate for activity tracking, however. An hour’s run without music consumes roughly 6% of the battery. That means the watch lasts for about 16 hours of tracking in its default settings, which is about the same as its power-efficient sibling and long enough for a marathon or two. It takes about an hour to fully charge with the included USB-C cable.

Sustainability

The Forerunner 265 is generally repairable. The battery is rated to last at least a few years of frequent charge cycles while maintaining at least 80% capacity. The watch does not contain any recycled materials. Garmin guarantees at least two years of security updates from release but typically supports its devices far longer. It offers trade-in schemes for some lines and complies with WEEE and other local electronics recycling laws.

Price

The Garmin Forerunner 265 comes in two sizes (42mm or 46mm) and costs £429.99 ($449.99/A$769)

For comparison, the Forerunner 255 Music costs £349.99, the Forerunner 955 costs £479.99, the Forerunner 965 costs £599.99 and the Garmin Epix costs £709. The Apple Watch Series 8 costs £419, Coros Pace 2 costs £180 and the Polar Vantage V2 costs £429.

Verdict

The Forerunner 265 proves that OLED screens can make for excellent sports watches but it is best to think of it as a “plus” version of the already great Forerunner 255 Music. It has a touchscreen and physical buttons, offline music and class-leading sport tracking, including the extremely useful training readiness. It has everything you need for running – short of full maps, which are still reserved for Garmin’s top watches.

The new screen reduces the daily battery life to about seven days between charges but that is still at least four times as long as an Apple Watch. The Garmin handles basic smartwatch features, such as simple alerts from your phone, but lacks a voice assistant and other smart bits.

An unexpected benefit of the crisper screen is that the smaller version of the 265 is much easier to read and use, which makes it more tempting.

While the added training readiness is a killer feature, the 265 it is not head and shoulders better for tracking runs than the Forerunner 255. Instead, it is a prettier, brighter option. OLED screens are clearly the future of sports watches but for now they command a premium over LCD-based rivals.

Pros: slim, light, real buttons, crisp OLED touchscreen, choice of sizes, multiband GPS, accurate heart rate, extensive stats, multisport, great health tracking, highly customisable, seven-day battery life, offline music, basic smartwatch features.

Cons: expensive, no offline maps, no voice assistant, shorter battery life than LCD-siblings, limited Garmin Pay compatibility with UK banks.

The Garmin Forerunner 265 showing various metrics while tracking a run.
Data screens, graphs and metrics are clearer and easier to read mid-run because of the sharper screen, particularly on the smaller 42mm size, as pictured. Photograph: Samuel Gibbs/the Guardian
Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.