Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Sports Illustrated
Sports Illustrated
Kevin Sweeney

Five Story Lines to Watch in the Men’s NCAA Tournament Top 16 Reveal

Alabama and Texas A&M are two of the teams in contention for top seeds in the men’s NCAA tournament. | Erik Williams-Imagn Images

Selection Sunday is still over a month away, but the NCAA tournament selection committee is already working toward piecing together the eventual field of 68. Saturday’s top 16 reveal is a big step in that direction, as the committee will unveil a mock top 16 ranking based on what’s happened thus far this season. A lot can change in a month, but the rankings will provide some hints at what this year’s committee values and which teams might be seen in a better light than the current bracketology consensus. 

Here’s a look at Sports Illustrated’s projected top 16 and five story lines to watch during Saturday’s reveal:

  1. Auburn Tigers
  2. Alabama Crimson Tide
  3. Duke Blue Devils
  4. Florida Gators
  5. Tennessee Volunteers
  6. Texas A&M Aggies
  7. Purdue Boilermakers
  8. Houston Cougars
  9. Iowa State Cyclones
  10. Arizona Wildcats
  11. Wisconsin Badgers
  12. Kentucky Wildcats
  13. Kansas Jayhawks
  14. Michigan Wolverines
  15. St. John's Red Storm
  16. Michigan State Spartans

Five Things to Watch

Duke’s Placement

From an eye test standpoint, the Blue Devils are arguably the best team in the country. Résumé-wise, there’s more to poke holes in. Duke does have a pair of elite wins against Arizona and Auburn, but in total possesses just nine wins against the top two quadrants. That pales in comparison to Auburn’s 16 and Alabama’s 15. I fully expect Duke to be on the No. 1 seed line, but their placement compared to the likes of Alabama, Florida and Tennessee will be fascinating. 

SEC Bracketing Principles

Our projected field has the SEC with five of the top six teams, six of the top 16 and one or two others in the conversation for a top-four seed. The league’s historic dominance could create headaches for the selection committee, potentially forcing them to break principles they generally abide by to accommodate so many teams clustered at the top of the bracket. We’ll get an early sense of how the committee plans to approach things with the top 16 reveal, though this is a topic to keep an eye on all the way to Selection Sunday. 

Purdue head coach Matt Painter
Purdue may be the class of the Big Ten once again under head coach Matt Painter. | Junfu Han / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

The Crowded Big Ten Pecking Order

The Big Ten currently has five teams in the top 18 of the NET and a total of seven in the top 25. Sorting out how the committee views these squads right now should give us a jump on how they’ll be seeded in March. As of now, Purdue seems to have the best résumé. The Boilermakers have 14 wins against the top two quadrants, top-tier wins against Alabama, Ole Miss, Michigan and Maryland and no bad losses. It’d be a surprise if Purdue wasn’t the highest-seeded Big Ten team Saturday. After that though, it’s anyone’s guess how Wisconsin, Michigan, Michigan State and perhaps Illinois are ordered on the seed list.

Where Does St. John’s Stand?

The Big East’s top dog in Year 2 under Rick Pitino, St. John’s has one of the more interesting résumés the committee will be considering Saturday. At 21–4, St. John’s has a gaudy record that clearly warrants top 16 consideration. But much of that work has been done against Quad 3 and 4 opponents, and the Red Storm have just three Quad 1 wins to their name with only weeks to go until Selection Sunday. From a metrics perspective, SJU would sit right on the bubble for top 16 selection. I’ve got them as a No. 4 seed, but the range here is fairly wide. 

New Metrics

The committee has two more metrics at its disposal on the team sheets: Wins Above Bubble (WAB) and T-Rank. WAB is a résumé metric that attempts to better value each individual result compared to what an average bubble team would do against the same schedule, while T-Rank is a predictive quality-based metric comparable to KenPom. It may be hard to tell exactly how much influence those numbers have (especially in a top 16 reveal), but it’s worth watching any trends related to that as well as any public comments from committee chair Bubba Cunningham. 

More College Basketball on Sports Illustrated


This article was originally published on www.si.com as Five Story Lines to Watch in the Men’s NCAA Tournament Top 16 Reveal.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.