A federal judge in Memphis heard arguments regarding whether the jury at the trial of four former police officers should be presented with evidence found in the car of Tyre Nichols, who died after a beating by officers. The discovery of hallucinogenic drugs and stolen credit cards in Nichols' car was discussed during a hearing.
The defense lawyers for the officers argued that the evidence explains Nichols' behavior that night, including why he did not immediately pull over when officers tried to stop him and why he resisted arrest. The incident escalated, leading to Nichols being beaten by officers, which resulted in his death three days later.
The five officers involved were indicted on federal charges of excessive force, failure to intervene, and obstruction of justice. One officer has pleaded guilty and may testify against the others, who have pleaded not guilty in both federal and state cases.
The defense attorneys emphasized the relevance of the car evidence, stating that it provides context to Nichols' actions and corroborates the officers' perceptions of his demeanor. They argued that withholding this evidence from the jury would hinder the officers' right to a fair trial.
Prosecutors, however, contended that the jury should not be informed about the items found in Nichols' car, as it could lead to speculation and character attacks on the victim. They maintained that the officers were unaware of the contents of the car during the incident.
U.S. District Judge Mark Norris is yet to rule on whether the jury will be allowed to consider the car evidence. He is also reviewing motions to dismiss or sever the charges against the former officers.
