Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics
Mabel Banfield-Nwachi and Eleni Courea

Farage doubles down on claim west provoked Ukraine invasion

Nigel Farage has doubled down on his claims that the west provoked the Russian invasion of Ukraine, refusing to apologise and insisting he is not an “apologist or supporter of Putin”.

The Reform UK leader had appeared on the BBC’s Panorama programme on Thursday night, drawing a link between Nato and EU expansion in recent decades and the conflict in eastern Europe.

On Saturday, Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer condemned the comments, with the prime minister saying it “plays into Putin’s hands” and the Labour leader describing it as “disgraceful”.

Writing in the Telegraph newspaper, in an article entitled “The west’s errors in Ukraine have been catastrophic. I won’t apologise for telling the truth”, Farage said the “political establishment” had been echoing a “slur” about him.

He added: “I am not and never have been an apologist or supporter of Putin. His invasion of Ukraine was immoral, outrageous and indefensible. As a champion of national sovereignty, I believe that Putin was entirely wrong to invade the sovereign nation of Ukraine.

“Nobody can fairly accuse me of being an appeaser. I have never sought to justify Putin’s invasion in any way and I’m not now.”

He added: “But that doesn’t change the fact that I saw it coming a decade ago, warned that it was coming and am one of the few political figures who has been consistently right and honest about Russia’s Ukraine war.

“What I have been saying for the past 10 years is that the west has played into Putin’s hands, giving him the excuse to do what he wanted to do anyway.”

Earlier on Saturday, Sunak had called Farage’s comments “disgraceful”, adding that Russia bore “sole responsibility” for the invasion of Ukraine.

“This is a man [Putin] who deployed nerve agent on the streets of Britain, who is doing deals with countries like North Korea, and this kind of appeasement is dangerous for Britain’s security, the security of our allies that rely on us, and only emboldens Putin further.”

Speaking to reporters at a campaign event in London, the Labour leader said: “Anyone who is standing for parliament ought to be really clear that Russia is the aggressor, Putin bears responsibility, and that we stand with Ukraine, as we have done from the beginning of this conflict. Parliament has spoken with one voice on this since the beginning of the conflict.”

Starmer added that Labour was “unshakeable in our commitment to Nato because this is about defending Ukraine, but it is also about defending our hard-won democracy and freedom, and anybody standing for public office ought to understand that”.

The Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, said he did not “share any values” with Farage. “My message to the British people: we need to support the Ukrainian people,” he added.

Farage’s comments have drawn widespread criticism.

The home secretary, James Cleverly, wrote on X: “Just Farage echoing Putin’s vile justification for the brutal invasion of Ukraine.”

The former shadow defence secretary John Healy said Farage would “rather lick Vladimir Putin’s boots than stand up for the people of Ukraine” while the former defence minister Tobias Ellwood told the Daily Telegraph that “Churchill will be turning in his grave” over the remarks.

The former defence secretary Ben Wallace described Farage as a “pub bore” who did not understand the “real world” of politics.

Wallace, who is not standing in the general election, told BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme: “I think Nigel Farage is a bit like that pub bore we have all met at the end of the bar who often says: ‘Oh no, if I was running the country’, and presents very simplistic answers to actually, I am afraid, in the 21st century, complex problems.

“It is not that easy to a) govern a country, but also to find international solutions to problems.”

Wallace added: “If he became prime minister tomorrow morning, what is his solution to dealing with a president Putin that he alleges he admires?

“A man who, remember, was involved in the murder of a British citizen, Dawn Sturgess, with deployment of nerve agent in Salisbury. Is his answer to that: we provoked him? He is going to have to deal with the real world.

“Saying some of these comments today, with that rather odd admiration for totalitarian leaders … ‘Oh well, he’s a good old strong leader’. Well, he might be a good old strong leader, but he’s done it at the expense of sacrificing half a million Russians.

“I don’t want that anywhere in our politics.”

Appearing on the Panorama Interviews on Friday, Farage faced questions about his opinion of Putin. He said: “I said I disliked him as a person, but I admired him as a political operator because he’s managed to take control of running Russia.”

Putin has served continuously as either Russian president or prime minister since 1999 through elections that have been described as “rigged”.

Farage, a former member of the European parliament, also said in his interview: “Right, I’ll tell you what you don’t know, I stood up in the European parliament in 2014 and I said, and I quote: ‘There will be a war in Ukraine.’

“Why did I say that? It was obvious to me that the ever-eastward expansion of Nato and the European Union was giving this man a reason to his Russian people to say, ‘They’re coming for us again’ and to go to war.”

Farage said he had been making similar comments “since the 1990s, ever since the fall of the [Berlin] Wall”, and added: “Hang on a second, we provoked this war. It’s, you know, of course it’s his fault – he’s used what we’ve done as an excuse.”

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.