Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Experts urge caution, warn of potential escalation in Iran conflict

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Democratic presidential candidate former Vice President Joe Biden attend the second and final presidential debate Oct. 22, 2020, at Belmont University in Nashvi

The recent attacks on the United States by Iran have raised concerns about the Biden administration's response and the potential consequences. Many experts and politicians have weighed in on the issue, offering their perspectives on the situation.

Former Governor Mike Huckabee expressed his dismay at the lack of response to previous attacks, questioning why the Biden administration did not take action earlier, suggesting that this inaction led to the recent events becoming inevitable. He criticized the perceived weakness shown and praised the approach taken by former President Donald Trump, which involved imposing sanctions on Iran to cripple their economy.

Victor Davis Hanson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, echoed Huckabee's sentiments. He emphasized the need for a strong deterrent and argued that being perceived as willing to do anything for peace ultimately leads to war. Hanson commended Trump's actions, which included killing Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani and imposing sanctions on Iran. He warned that the current administration's appeasement and lack of strong action may lead to even larger conflict in the future.

Both Huckabee and Hanson agreed on the importance of a proportional response to the attacks. They suggested cutting off Iran's financing as a way to curb the proxy wars and terror attacks that the country supports globally. Huckabee proposed targeting specific assets like refineries, while Hanson emphasized the need to be quiet and unpredictable to avoid escalating tensions further.

The experts emphasized that their goal was to avoid a full-blown war but acknowledged the necessity of taking decisive action against Iran. They argued that the Trump administration's approach had successfully deterred Iran and called for a return to the previous protocols and sanctions.

The discussion centered on the significance of maintaining a strong deterrent and sending a clear message to Iran. The experts warned that predictable and weak responses would only embolden Iran to continue its aggressive actions. They stressed the importance of avoiding a large-scale war but acknowledged that taking out refineries might become necessary if the situation escalates further.

As the international community closely watches the developments between the United States and Iran, the experts' viewpoints provide valuable insights into the various options and potential consequences. The Biden administration continues to face pressure to navigate this delicate situation carefully to prevent further instability in the region.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.