With Everton on the cusp of signing Lille midfielder Amadou Onana and progressing well with plans to bring back Idrissa Gueye, there has been head scratching going on among some Blues fans.
A reported fee of around £33.5m for 20-year-old Belgian international Onana and any deal for a Gueye return, with French media claiming a fee of around £8.5m from Paris Saint-Germain, would add to the near £20m spent on bringing Burnley winger Dwight McNeil to Goodison Park last month.
It's more than a month since Everton had to bid a reluctant farewell to the talismanic Brazilian Richarlison, but a £60m fee from Tottenham Hotspur and a deal closed just before the end of the club's 2021/22 financial year was one that provided them with little room for manoeuvre.
READ MORE: What Amadou Onana did on his first day at Everton as new banner spotted
READ MORE: Everton seek new type of player as Frank Lampard and Frank Thelwell close in on more transfers
Everton's financial pain has been well documented, with their heavy spend since 2016 under owner Farhad Moshiri to try and artificially close the gap on the 'big six' while the club tried to play catch up with revenues and stadium development, ultimately led them to skirt close to breaching the Premier League's profit and sustainability rules.
The Toffees have been in dialogue with the Premier League for over a year around how they manage the situation and there has been evident cost cutting and belt tightening from a playing perspective, with James Rodriguez and Lucas Digne leaving during last season, while the departure of Richarlison adds to a list of senior players who commanded big wages being released at the end of their deals; Cenk Tosun, Fabian Delph and Gylfi Sigurdsson among them.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine impacted the club through the sanctions placed upon Moshiri's friend and long-time business partner Alisher Usmanov due to historic links with Russian president Vladimir Putin, with Everton ending their ties with USM Holdings, the company owned by Usmanov and formerly chaired by Moshiri that had become key commercial partners to the Toffees.
The accounts over the last three seasons show pre-tax losses equating to some £372m. Heavy spend on transfers, stadium costs and being unable to recoup strong numbers from player sales have all contributed at a time where revenue streams haven't been able to grow at rate to keep pace with spend.
But accounts are a snapshot in time, and the financial accounts for 2020/21 that were pored over most recently when they were released at the end of March will tell a very different story to where the club is currently operating, given that they have even now put the 2021/22 financial year to bed and are working to a 2022/23 financial year.
The sale of Richarlison was inevitable. If it wasn't Richarlison it would have had to be another asset. There was an acceptance that the club needed to raise funds by cashing in one one major player before the end of the financial year, a move that would help ease some of the financial strain in the 2021/22 financial period.
The last financial year includes the sale of Digne to Aston Villa for £25m, the removal of Rodriguez's hefty wages off the payroll and the sale of Richarlison, while there was limited spend on Demarai Gray, Vitalii Mykolenko and Nathan Patterson's arrivals.
As June turned into July there was some more breathing space for Everton, and while not a clean slate it was certainly cleaner than it had been for 2022/23's financial year. There have been some commercial deals struck to aid matters, the Stake.com and BOXT deals the most prominent of those.
Everton had to wait to spend, they had little alternative. There was a need for things to happen to allow them to enter the market, and while they aren't going into it with the gusto that they may have done in more recent years, nor at the same rate as other Premier League rivals (Nottingham Forest have spent £85m for their top-flight return), they are able to make some headway with their transfer business.
First off, there was a realisation that if the club were serious about avoiding the issues of last season and their battle with relegation, something that would have been a financial catastrophe, there has to be improvements made, particularly when their most potent weapon was required to be sold off.
A free transfer for James Tarkowski, a £20m deal for McNeil and potentially upwards of £40m spent on Onana and Gueye would represent some strengthening in key areas with quality additions, although a striking addition is still sought.
Being part of the Premier League's elite is key to the business model of the vast majority of member clubs. For a club like Everton, a founding member in 1992 that have only ever known four seasons outside of English football's top tier in their 134-year history, it is vital. Had they fallen through the trapdoor into the Championship then the funds on offer from sponsorship and TV money would have been a fraction of what they receive in the Premier League, but their wage bill would have been no less onerous.
To spend nothing and have to go through another summer transfer window of £1.5m spent would have increased the risk of such things happening again, and in order to try and aid their financial situation more quickly moving forward, they simply have to be part of the Premier League elite, especially with Bramley Moore Dock on the horizon. With even promoted clubs willing to spend there is a requirement for some funds to be made available to ensure that there is progression instead of continued regression, it would be financial folly to stand still and hope that all would be well without adding quality to a side that struggled so badly last season.
Crucially, the spend is also affordable. The wage liabilities at the club are presently far reduced from what they were 12 months ago, and that means that there is headroom for new additions at the same time as enabling the club to work towards addressing the heavy losses that have existed on their balance sheets over the last three seasons, a considerable sum of that pandemic related.
Onana is reported to be penning a five-year deal, while McNeil has penned the same. The value of their transfer fees isn't something that is necessarily coughed up straight away, and even if it is then for accounting purposes it would still be amortised over the duration of the deal, meaning that any move for Onana would appear in Everton's accounts as £6.7m amortisation charge. For McNeil, using his £20m fee and five-year deal, that would be accounted for as £4m per year, meaning that combined the amortised cost of signing the players would be just short of £11m per year.
Everton have reduced wage liabilities and increased commercial revenues on key partnerships recently, something that will embolden them to hand manager Frank Lampard some leeway to add players. There has also been the higher than expected Premier League TV deal internationally, worth around £10bn over the life of the contract, that Everton and the rest of the Premier League member clubs will receive an extra slice of.
All that, allied with normal service being resumed post-Covid, means that there have been some green shoots of recovery, although there is still a long way to go. But for Everton to remain part of the established elite clubs there has to be an element of seeing the strengthening as an investment. They can't afford right now to be in the market for players to push them on to Champions League challengers, but they can afford to add the right players to allow them to stabilise as a Premier League club once more and find their way back competitively and financially ahead of their move into a new home in 2024, something that will provide them with revenue streams that they have never been able to tap into.
READ NEXT:
Everton 'ready to battle' with Chelsea and Manchester United for £15m striker
Thomas Tuchel explains how Everton made it hard for Chelsea to secure 'tough win'
Frank Lampard breaks silence on Amadou Onana transfer to Everton
Everton still missing transfer after Chelsea defeat leaves burning question
