Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World
Lisa O'Carroll in Brussels

EU looks to Egypt partnership to tackle people-smuggling networks

The EU’s high representative on foreign affairs, Josep Borrell, meets the Egyptian minister of foreign affairs, Sameh Shoukry.
The EU’s high representative on foreign affairs, Josep Borrell, meets the Egyptian minister of foreign affairs, Sameh Shoukry. Photograph: Mohamed Hossam/EPA

The EU may seek a new wide-ranging partnership with Egypt including measures to stem irregular migration and break criminal people-smuggling networks.

EU leaders are already exploring plans beyond a looming €1bn (£860m) deal with Tunisia to other countries in Africa as part of a wider bid to tackle the root causes of migration-related deaths and disappearances.

Nine Egyptians were arrested on suspicion of people-smuggling after a shipwreck disaster off the coast of Greece killed at least 81 people.

Sources at the summit said there was a lot of support for the Tunisia deal, with the Italian prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, telling other EU leaders that “Tunisia was an example of what we can do with other countries”.

The ground may have been paved already for talks with Egypt after a visit by the EU’s high representative on foreign affairs, Josep Borrell, who pledged €20m to help the country support refugees from Sudan.

Before the prime ministers sat down to the summit dinner, Poland – which has opposed the EU draft migration legislation agreed two weeks ago – made fresh demands to reopen the law making process.

In a provocative move it tabled new wording, stating: “EU migration and asylum policy should be based on the sovereign right of member states to shape their migration policy and decide who they accept on their territory.”

In a paragraph completely at odds with the concept of “mandatory solidarity” agreed in Luxembourg it also said it should be up to member states, not the bloc, to decide “how to best support countries affected by a massive migrants influx”.

EU leaders had been expecting to sign off on the new partnership with Tunisia at a summit of leaders in Brussels on Thursday but negotiations continue on the details, which remain controversial.

The EU is seeking guarantees on protections on human rights but details have not been made public.

Sources say if the Tunisia deal gets through then there is appetite among EU leaders to explore similar partnerships with other countries as part of “out-of-the-box” solutions mooted by the European Commission leader, Ursula von der Leyen, earlier this week.

Eight member states, including Denmark, Austria and Greece, raised a request before the European Council summit for “innovative solutions” to irregular migration, which is now a political issue across many member states.

They did not elaborate, but on the eve of the summit suggestions swirled that this included anything inspired by the UK’s plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing, even though this was deemed unlawful by a London court on Thursday.

“Innovative solutions seem to be using third countries as places to send asylum seekers similar to the UK’s Rwanda deal. Some member states would like that; others are very opposed,” said one diplomat.

But it was felt that a demonstration of openness to examine other solutions might send “a strong message” to countries such as Denmark and Greece that their concerns were being taken on board.

When asked about why the details of the Tunisian deal still remained confidential, diplomats were keen to stress that the package was wider than migration, including supports for a reform agenda set by the International Monetary Fund and funds for research and education as well as the Medusa digital cable link to Europe.

The 27 EU leaders swiftly agreed its future framework on Ukraine agreeing to “double down rather than weaken” military and recovery supports.

On the request of Estonia it also agreed that it would in future be “defence ready”, to address the ammunitions shortages experienced during the first year of war in Ukraine.

They also agreed to progress work on setting up a tribunal where “crimes of aggression” could be tried in a court that would work in parallel with the international criminal court in The Hague.

Security commitments to Ukraine were also on the agenda with an agreement to further work on that matter and the issue of frozen assets.

Leaders were asked to give their agreement in principle to a new “windfall contribution” or levy on €100bn in sovereign Russian funds held in Brussels. This has been given the legal green light by senior advisers to the commission and is expected to be implemented after further discussions with the US, UK and other G7 nations.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.