Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
World

Ed Sheeran should know Band Aid did a lot of good, but development is better

Ed Sheeran
Ed Sheeran has said he would rather not be on the 40th-anniversary version of Band Aid charity single Do They Know It’s Christmas? Photograph: Hotsauce/Rex/Shutterstock

The comments made by Ed Sheeran (Ed Sheeran: I wish I wasn’t on 40th-anniversary version of Band Aid, 18 November), reflect the continuing confusion between “aid” and “development”. Band Aid was a terrific way to raise funds and public engagement to relieve the appalling starvation that affected Ethiopia (where I was most marginally involved) and other parts of Africa in 1985, after almost six years of drought and a vicious military government. “Development” is a much longer-term programme of prevention and nurturing the capacity of local people to look after themselves. The “aid” agencies, by constantly emphasising the need to relieve starvation, are benefiting from donations, but removing agency from local people. The global economic framework is preventing poor countries from using their own tools to develop. It therefore makes international NGOs and the World Food Programme the arbiters of who lives and who dies. Hunger is, as usual, a weapon of war. I try to explain the politics of aid in Toxic Aid, described on our website.
Benny Dembitzer
Grassroots Malawi

• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.