Former Republican Congressman Jeff Fortenberry seems like a lifelong obsession for the Department of Justice (DOJ). The focus has now shifted to President Biden's son, Hunter Biden, following his deposition earlier this year. Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a member of the Ways and Means Committee and a former federal prosecutor and law enforcement officer, sheds light on the situation.
During Hunter Biden's deposition, two whistleblowers identified three statements that were deemed provably false. These statements revolved around a WhatsApp message to a Chinese national, his position at Rosemount, and assistance provided to the CEO of Burisma for a visa application. Such false statements could potentially violate Section 1001 of Title 18, constituting a felony.
Rep. Fitzpatrick explains the process of referring the case to the DOJ for investigation, emphasizing that the timeline for such proceedings is beyond the control of Congress members. While the referral process may lead to a formal investigation, the ultimate decision lies with the DOJ on whether to pursue charges.
Regarding the possibility of a presidential pardon for Hunter Biden, Rep. Fitzpatrick expresses reservations about the use of pardons except in rare cases. He acknowledges the complexities of legal cases and the importance of the justice system in delivering verdicts.
Speculation arises about President Biden potentially pardoning his son and even former President Donald Trump on federal matters. Rep. Fitzpatrick views such a move as bold, highlighting the significance of allowing the justice system to run its course.
In conclusion, the situation involving Hunter Biden's false statements during his deposition raises questions about potential legal implications. The decision-making process now rests with the DOJ, with Rep. Fitzpatrick emphasizing the importance of upholding the justice system's integrity.
