In the ongoing legal proceedings, the defense has raised a point regarding an instruction they wish to provide to the jury concerning how they should interpret testimony related to reactions from external sources, such as the 'Access Hollywood' tape incident.
The defense, represented by Trump attorney Emil Bove, has emphasized the need for a curative instruction. Bove argues that evidence of reactions from others should not be considered for its factual content but rather for its potential impact on Trump's state of mind. He expressed concern that this distinction might not be clear to the jury without proper guidance.
On the other hand, the prosecution, led by Merchan, has indicated a different perspective. While Merchan acknowledged the defense's request and mentioned that he would consider it, he leaned towards the view that there was no prejudicial effect from the evidence in question. He asserted that the purpose of introducing such testimony was sufficiently evident to the jury.
Throughout the session following the break, Trump was observed reclining in his chair with his eyes closed, indicating a demeanor of relaxation or contemplation.
