During yesterday's testimony, former federal prosecutor and constitutional law attorney Katie Cherkasky shared her insights on Michael Cohen's statements. Cohen admitted to being motivated to see Trump face legal consequences and acknowledged his willingness to lie under oath. Cherkasky highlighted the credibility issues surrounding Cohen's testimony, emphasizing that his past dishonesty raises doubts about his current claims.
Cherkasky also questioned the validity of the allegations against Cohen, particularly regarding the charges related to legal expenses and retainers. She pointed out that lawyers often cover costs for clients upfront, making it unclear how these actions constitute criminal behavior. Additionally, she noted that Cohen's defense of lying out of loyalty to Trump may not sway jurors, as his history of dishonesty extends beyond his relationship with the former president.
As the prosecution's final witness, Cohen poses a challenge for the defense. Cherkasky explained that the defense may opt not to present its case if it believes the prosecution failed to prove its claims. While there is speculation about Trump testifying, Cherkasky suggested that it might not be necessary and could be advised against by his legal team.
Looking ahead, Cherkasky discussed the possibility of a directed verdict, where the judge dismisses the case if the prosecution fails to provide sufficient evidence. She highlighted the lack of concrete proof of false business entries in Cohen's actions, raising doubts about the strength of the prosecution's case.
In conclusion, Cherkasky emphasized the need for substantial evidence to support the charges against Cohen. With the trial unfolding in unexpected ways, the legal proceedings are set to continue with potential twists and turns in the coming weeks.
