The decision on a new nine-home development labelled ‘intrusive on neighbours privacy’ has been deferred by Rochdale Council’s Planning Committee. The fact this hadn’t gone to the Pennine Planning Panel before this and the confusion over specific details meant councillors were uncomfortable approving it, the meeting at Number One Riverside heard on October 20.
The site, just off Chestnut Way in Littleborough within an active residential area, was subject to ridicule from a number of neighbours - with 29 letters of objection being submitted in total. This covered concerns around flooding, minimal separation between houses, traffic increases and fears they would overlook neighbouring houses.
One house in particular - plot 6 - was claimed to be built over a land drain, fuelling distress over drainage and flooding issues.
READ MORE: Man killed by falling tree was working as a traffic warden
The ‘lack of detail’ in the planning application from Angel Manor Ltd was a point of confusion for many on the planning committee. The officer and applicant said there was adequate distance between the new houses and the neighbours (14m between a principal window and any directly facing two storey elevation) and objector Claire Brierley claimed the distance was less than that of ‘a soft toy snake’ she brought as a prop.
“We are not objecting to building or development, we just don’t want it to affect our properties,” she told the committee. “Let’s sort the issues first before making a decision.”
The nine homes would be detached and be two storeys in height, something the developer had ‘worked with officers for one and a half years’. The applicant also told the committee that he would take away the water features after Coun Billy Sheerin claimed ‘a child can drown in’ - this chopping and changing during the committee meeting was one of the reasons the plan got deferred.
Applicant Bob El Hage claimed he had installed a land drain ‘as a good gesture’ when he first bought the land due to the ‘historic flooding issues’ which he said he didn’t have to do. However, he failed to convince councillors of the precise detail on whether building would be on top of current drains and how high certain buildings were going to be, which led to the can being kicked down the road until next month’s planning committee meeting.
Ward councillors John Taylor and Ashley Dearnley were in attendance backing up objectors points, who they claim had not been listened to by the developer during the consultation period. They also told the committee that this should have been brought before the Pennine Planning Panel prior to the meeting - which they believe would have ironed out the kinks in this application.
The motion to defer this application to the next meeting, as a result of planning detail confusion and that it hadn’t gone before the specific Pennine panel, was carried.
Read today's top stories here.
READ NEXT:
- Boris Johnson urged to stand for Prime Minister as race kicks off to find Liz Truss' replacement
- Disabled army veteran slams path that's 'bane of his life'
- A day of chaos: Liz Truss bows out after just 44 days in office with Boris Johnson planning remarkable return to No 10
- Woman tried to set neighbour's flat on fire after decade long dispute
- Man asks popular restaurant to write 'Will you marry me?' inside PIZZA BOX in proposal to girlfriend
