Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
inkl
inkl

Decision Making Psychology in Modern Dating When Presented with Multiple Potential Partners

Relationship Deciding Scale Findings

A series of studies developed and tested the Relationship Deciding Scale or RDS. The first study involved 995 undergraduate students, consisting of 787 women and 208 men, with a mean age of 19.41 years. Among them, 53% were in a romantic relationship, and 80% of these relationships were exclusive. The RDS comprises three subscales: Relationship Confidence, Knowledge of Warning Signs, and Deciding.

Subsequent studies aimed to validate and measure the scale's utility over time. In one study with 963 participants, confirmatory factor analysis was used to demonstrate convergent and discriminant validity. The RDS was effective in predicting relationship characteristics 14 weeks later. Furthermore, a semester-long intervention assessing sensitivity to change was conducted with 805 participants. This examination found that interventions focusing on decision-making in relationships influenced the three identified factors.


Modeling Dating Decisions

A study examined participant and target characteristics in a mock swiping scenario, analyzing individual and partner characteristics that impact dating decisions. The study encompassed research on several variables in online dating, such as attractiveness, dating goals, and attachment orientations. The analysis revealed that these variables influence user decisions when presented with multiple potential partners.

In online dating systems, approximately 30 million Americans engage in initiating romantic relationships online. Interestingly, married couples who met online showed lower divorce rates and higher satisfaction levels. Decision-making in online dating is influenced by the system's design. Studies assessed three formats: see-and-screen, algorithm-based, and blended systems. Blended systems, which combine user control and algorithmic assistance, were found to offer optimal benefits by merging personalized selection with computational validation.

Research findings indicate that these blended systems are preferred as they provide the best of both worlds. Users appreciate retaining control over their choices but also value the algorithm's input in validating potential matches. This model appeals to users seeking a balance between personal agency and the efficiency of algorithmic matchmaking.


Time-Bound Commitments in Dating

In contrast to casual hookups or ambiguous "talking" stages, time-bound commitments

 involve clearly communicated promises with fixed expiration dates. This approach can replace the uncertainty and anxiety associated with informal dating.

Time-bound commitments offer a clear structure, reducing the perceived threat of breaking up. They provide couples with a shared project, fostering collaboration towards mutual goals. Such commitments could be particularly beneficial during transitional life phases, establishing a temporary but deliberate framework for relationships.

In some cases, the decision-making process may involve choosing between multiple partners. 


Sliding versus Deciding in Relationships

Studies highlight the importance of actively making decisions during key relationship transitions. Sliding, or the lack of conscious decision-making, poses risks for adverse outcomes in relationships. For example, women might be choosing between two guys based on some kind of innocuous factor such as hair color without noticing.

Research shows that transitions such as sex, cohabitation, marriage, and pregnancy are critical points where conscious decision-making is essential.

A landmark study investigated the differences between sliding and deciding. The study found that relationships where decisions were made consciously experienced lower levels of distress. This underscores that deliberate choices, rather than passive progression, contribute to healthier and more stable relationships.

In this context, interventions targeting decision-making can enhance relationship stability. Encouraging individuals to make active decisions during significant transitions helps mitigate risks and promotes overall relationship health.

Analyzing these findings offers valuable insights into the psychology of modern dating. The studies emphasize the need for conscious decision making, whether in immediate relational contexts or through technologically mediated platforms. Decision making tools like the RDS and innovative dating system designs are instrumental in navigating the complexities of relationships today.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.