During a recent court testimony, David Pecker, the former head of the National Enquirer empire, revealed details about catch-and-kill payments made to assist Donald Trump's presidential campaign. Pecker confirmed under oath that he had engaged in such practices, including paying for false stories and silencing allegations from individuals like former Playboy playmate Karen McDougal.
Pecker's testimony shed light on the close relationship between the National Enquirer and the Trump campaign. He described instances where he was asked to publish positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his opponents. Pecker also mentioned how he felt it was his duty to help keep damaging stories about Trump out of other publications.
One notable revelation from the testimony was the involvement of former Trump fixer Michael Cohen in coordinating efforts between Pecker and the Trump campaign. Pecker recalled being asked by Trump and Cohen how his magazines could support the campaign, to which he responded by offering to run positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his rivals.
Pecker's testimony highlighted the extent to which the National Enquirer was willing to go to support Trump's candidacy, including the potential suppression of unfavorable stories in other media outlets. The testimony also touched on the relationship dynamics between Pecker, Cohen, and Trump, showcasing a level of collaboration that went beyond traditional media practices.
Overall, Pecker's testimony provided a glimpse into the inner workings of the National Enquirer and its role in shaping the narrative around Trump during his presidential campaign. The revelations from the trial underscore the complex web of relationships and tactics employed behind the scenes in the world of political media and influence.
