In each Premier League season, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system manages to stir up controversy on a regular basis. Fans, players, and pundits alike are often left questioning the decisions made by VAR and whether they are correct. To shed light on this issue, let's delve into the process of VAR decision-making, as well as its adherence to the Laws of the Game.
Taking a closer look at the major incidents from the recent weekend, we begin with the clash between Brentford and Nottingham Forest. Brentford managed to equalize through Ivan Toney's goal from a free kick in the 19th minute, but the goal was not as straightforward as it initially appeared. Moving the ball to the right before taking the free kick and strategically placing some of the referee's vanishing spray in front of the ball gave Toney an advantage. However, despite the controversy surrounding his actions, VAR couldn't intervene as it is unable to advise on yellow-card offenses or offenses related to the restart of play.
In another incident, Neal Maupay scored a goal for Brentford in the 68th minute, but Forest players questioned whether there was a handball involved. After a VAR review, it was deemed that there was no evidence to suggest a handball, and the goal stood.
Moving on to Bournemouth, Justin Kluivert found himself in a situation where a potential red card was at stake. During a clash with Luis Díaz, Kluivert's challenge was assessed by VAR, but no red card was given. This decision sparked debate about the leniency towards serious foul play challenges in the Premier League compared to other leagues in Europe.
In a different match, Diogo Jota of Liverpool went down in the penalty area after a challenge from Illia Zabarnyi. Despite some arguments for a penalty, VAR decided that there wasn't enough evidence to consider it a 'clear and obvious' error.
In another game, Sheffield United was awarded a penalty in the eighth minute of added time against West Ham. The decision was heavily debated, as the challenge on Oliver McBurnie by goalkeeper Alphonse Areola appeared to be minimal. However, VAR didn't intervene, and the spot kick was converted, leading to Sheffield United securing a vital point.
West Ham also saw a penalty appeal denied when Jarrod Bowen went down under pressure from Anel Ahmedhodzic. After a VAR review, it was determined that there was simultaneous holding between the players, leading to the decision to not award a penalty.
Lastly, in the match between Arsenal and Manchester United, Gabriel scored two headed goals from corners. Despite some potential questions regarding fouls on defenders, VAR ultimately decided that there were no clear and obvious errors, and the goals stood.
While VAR continues to be a contentious topic, it's important to understand the limitations and protocols that govern its decision-making process. VAR can intervene in certain situations, such as offside calls and handballs, but its involvement is restricted when it comes to yellow-card offenses and restarts of play. This creates inconsistencies in its application, which can lead to frustration among fans and clubs.
Despite calls for change or the expansion of VAR's remit, it's crucial to note that FIFA has control over VAR protocol since 2020, and any modifications would need to come from this governing body. It's also worth acknowledging that VAR decisions are not always easy or definitive, as they often require subjective assessments based on the available evidence.
While controversies surrounding VAR are likely to persist, it's essential for both fans and stakeholders to have an understanding of the system's rules and limitations. This can help foster a more informed and constructive dialogue about its impact on the game.
