Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Leeds Live
Leeds Live
National
David Spereall & Danielle Hoe

Controversial Leeds riverside tower block plan for 500 new apartments 'begrudgingly' approved

Controversial plans to build 500 new riverside apartments in the centre of Leeds have been approved by councillors, by a single vote.

Developers Glenbrook are now set to build two blocks, measuring 19 and 16 storeys respectively, on the car park on Whitehall Road, close to Leeds’ train station.

Objectors from the neighbouring flats on Whitehall Road had fought against the proposals, as they said the development would overshadow their own living quarters and create more traffic.

Read More: Woman dies in Seacroft as Land Rover mounts pavement and hits her

But a planning committee narrowly voted in favour of the plans on Thursday, by a margin of six to five, after being told by officers that the application complied with council policies.

In recent weeks, Glenbrook had agreed to designate some of the flats as “affordable housing” and install play equipment in the green space that will be created as part of the scheme.

Those adjustments were made following criticism from councillors at a meeting last month.

But concerns remained about the mix of housing on the site, with many elected members concerned that only 10 per cent of the apartments will be three-bed homes, while more than half will be one-beds.

Morley Borough Independent (MBI) councillor Robert Finnigan said: “We know that in terms of creating cohesive communities, if you have too many one-beds, then you get a revolving community and you get turnover that undermines that sense of community.

“How we can create cohesive communities by accepting this development is totally and utterly beyond me.”

Labour councillor Peter Carlill said he too was unhappy with several aspects of the application, likening it to the totting up of minor errors on a driving test.

But he predicted that if the development was rejected, it would probably be overturned on appeal, which would cost the council legal fees.

That view was echoed by several other members.

Councillor Carlill said: “It’s not a development I’m particularly proud to support, but it’s one where I think the only thing we probably can do is begrudgingly support it and then work on the policies to make them stronger and neater going forwards.”

Read more:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.