In a surprising twist that has captivated online communities and skeptical investigators alike, Julia Faustyna—also known as Julia Wandelt and Julia Wendell—has reemerged with claims that her identity is supported by new forensic tests. The self-proclaimed Madeleine McCann, who first gained infamy in 2023 with her controversial declarations and dubious “evidence,” is now back in the spotlight after DNA, dental, and voice comparisons were allegedly completed.
Julia initially attracted millions of followers online when she asserted that she was, in fact, the missing Madeleine McCann. Despite her efforts and the circulation of questionable evidence, law enforcement dismissed her claims. Following this debacle, she deactivated her “I Am Madeleine McCann” Instagram profile and seemingly vanished from the public eye. However, in November she republished her account, accompanied by a fresh wave of so-called evidence that reignited public debate, reported by the Tab.
The recent development came when Julia revealed that the long-awaited DNA test results were finally available. In a brand new Instagram post, Julia wrote: “Since my parents in Poland and Kate and Gerry McCann have refused to take a DNA test, my DNA results were submitted to a world expert who compared them to the DNA found at the Madeleine McCann crime scene in Portugal.” This statement has once again stirred controversy, as it not only references the notorious case but also questions the willingness of the McCanns to engage with the forensic process.
Further elaborating on her claim, Julia detailed in a subsequent post that she had received results for not only DNA comparisons but also eye fleck, dental, and voice comparisons. However, instead of releasing the actual results, she urged her followers to contact Mr Surjit Singh from Effective Media for further details. After inquiries, a correspondent named Tyla reported that Mr Surjit Singh confirmed that comparisons had indeed taken place despite the refusal of Kate and Gerry McCann to participate. Curiously, Singh refrained from revealing any specific outcomes and maintained only that testing had been conducted.
Adding another layer of intrigue to the saga, it emerged that Effective Media, the company associated with Mr Surjit Singh, had been dissolved as per Companies House records in 2015. Despite this oddity, Julia’s Instagram comments have largely remained supportive, though not without expressing skepticism. One follower remarked: “Why would you tell all your followers who have waited patiently for the results of DNA to make all inquiries through Effective Media Ltd unless all your followers are either journalists or something else they will not release the said result.” Another queried, “Are we going to know the results or we must contact the mentioned gentleman for it?” while a third commented, “Sorry but if the results were that your Madeleine it would be breaking news!”
As the debate continues, both supporters and critics await further clarification on the mysterious and contentious evidence Julia claims to have in her possession.
