Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal recently addressed the issue of the use of the word 'exonerate' in relation to the 345-page report by Robert Herr. The Congresswoman clarified that the report did not find sufficient evidence to prosecute President Biden on any of the charges investigated, thus absolving him of blame, which aligns with the common definition of 'exonerate.'
She criticized Herr's attempt to create a distinction without a difference by using the term 'exoneration' in a legal context. Jayapal emphasized that the report clearly stated the lack of evidence to move forward with any charges against President Biden, indicating a form of exoneration.
Regarding Herr's statement that he did not unfairly disparage the president in his report, Jayapal expressed her belief that Herr could have presented his findings without prejudice. She suggested that Herr's decision to make the report public, despite its sensitive nature, may have influenced his approach in characterizing his beliefs about President Biden.
Overall, Jayapal questioned the appropriateness of Herr's conclusions about President Biden and highlighted the importance of presenting information objectively, especially in reports of such significance. She emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in handling sensitive matters involving public figures.
