Wednesday saw a wave of objections raised against the proposed lawsuit settlement that is poised to reshape the college sports landscape. The primary concern voiced by many pertains to the potential impact of roster limits on athletes participating in 'Olympic sports,' with reports indicating that numerous players have already been cut from their respective teams.
As part of the settlement, the NCAA has put forth roster limits that would be enforced for schools opting to comply with the terms of the agreement. While these new limits aim to increase the number of scholarships available to schools, projections suggest that over 10,000 spots in 'non-revenue' or Olympic sports across the NCAA could be at risk due to restrictions on the number of walk-ons permitted on teams.
Several individuals, including parents of affected athletes, have expressed dismay over the sudden loss of roster spots. They argue that such actions contradict the NCAA's stated mission of providing a top-tier athletic and academic experience for student-athletes.
The deadline for submitting objections to the settlement is Friday, with a federal court hearing scheduled for April 7 to determine final approval of the terms. Notably, the settlement introduces a groundbreaking provision allowing schools to directly compensate athletes up to $20.5 million for their name, image, and likeness, subjecting participating schools to the roster limits.
Concerns have been raised by various stakeholders, such as swimmers and tennis players, regarding the potential repercussions of the roster limits on their sports. The Intercollegiate Tennis Association has urged decision-makers to thoroughly assess the unintended consequences on non-football and non-basketball sports and their participants.
Plaintiff attorney Jeffrey Kessler remains confident that the objections raised will not impede the final approval of the settlement. He emphasizes that individuals dissatisfied with the roster limits still retain legal options and can address grievances directly with the NCAA.
The NCAA defends the roster limits as part of a broader strategy aimed at enhancing athlete welfare by offering improved healthcare, increased scholarship opportunities, and protections for scholarship recipients. Notably, objections have also been raised by individual athletes, such as a former soccer player and a walk-on football player, regarding the distribution of backpay under the settlement.
Kessler clarifies that a formula devised by experts determined the allocation of the $2.8 million payout, emphasizing that all athletes have the right to opt out of the class-action lawsuit and pursue independent legal action if desired.
